Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

March 03, 2003 04:54PM
I was referring to the actual weight of the locomotive. The 36 does stand for 36,200 lbs. of tractive effort and respectively for the other class locomotives. I was just wondering the weight difference between the K-28's to the 37 and 37 class. Also, when the K-37's were C-41's, how much of a weight change and other spec.s changes at that time, and is there anywhere I can see a picture of one before it was converted?
Subject Author Posted

492 at Rockwood in 1963?

William March 02, 2003 07:10PM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Jonathan Lewis March 03, 2003 06:59AM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Fred Beverage March 03, 2003 07:48AM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Earl March 03, 2003 10:09AM

Earl has it!!! That's the one! *NM*

Fred Beverage March 03, 2003 10:42AM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

John Hillier March 03, 2003 11:15AM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Fred Beverage March 03, 2003 12:50PM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Jim Adams March 03, 2003 04:13PM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

John Hillier March 03, 2003 04:54PM

160K

Fred Beverage March 03, 2003 05:39PM

Weights

Rich Muth March 03, 2003 07:22PM

Re: Weights

John Hillier March 03, 2003 07:39PM

Weight on Drivers

Mike Trent March 04, 2003 06:38AM

Tractive force

Mike March 04, 2003 06:58AM

Right. Thanks, Mike *NM*

Mike Trent March 04, 2003 08:48AM

Brain Lapse

Fred Beverage March 04, 2003 08:29AM

Re: 160K

Jerry Day March 05, 2003 08:27AM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963? *LINK*

Greg Scholl March 03, 2003 05:38PM

NG loco Specs *LINK* *PIC*

Chris Coleman March 04, 2003 07:32AM

The Eureka *LINK*

Don Richter March 04, 2003 07:38AM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Jerry Day March 04, 2003 07:04PM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963? *LINK*

John Kelly (K-36 487) March 05, 2003 08:06PM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Jerry Day March 05, 2003 09:18PM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963? *LINK*

Jerry March 07, 2003 02:57PM

Re: 492 at Rockwood in 1963?

Jerry Day March 07, 2003 06:02PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.