Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

September 18, 2014 10:08AM
Nothing to apologize for (no "sorry" needed) - this is something beyond introductory photography.

Skonk has already provided you with a fine answer, from the keyboard of a professional no less, but I just can't resist adding words from an amateur photographer who happened to minor in physics.

A perfect lens would have a parabolic surface; actually doing that is very difficult, so the usual lens has a spherical surface ... and the item you call a "lens" is actually a group of "elements" in series trying to compensate for the various issues that come up for various wavelengths (colors). Designing a lens is as much art as science; Japan came to dominate camera production by first dominating lens design.

The more money you spend, the more work of this you are buying, but no matter how much you spend, the result is a lens that does an imperfect job, and the more (diameter) of the lens you use, less perfect is the job it does.

One of the skills that goes with being an experienced photographer is knowing how to use this. These days, you will see the term "bokeh" used to describe the aesthetics of the part of the picture that is seriously out of focus; people will judge a lens partly by the quality of the bokeh it creates. As a photographer of trains, you will find your mind at war with itself; at a given ISO setting, if you go to a higher shutter speed to stop motion, you will get a larger aperture, so less of the picture will be in focus. That may be bad, or it may be good. You can get a very good effect if you get just the right combination of the train being crisp while the background is fuzzy, so attention is focused on the train but there remains a hint of its surroundings.

Just now I went to my closet and found the last non-autofocus camera I used, a Pentax that I bought in 1984. Like many of its type, there are markings on the lens barrel that tell how much area will be in focus.

For example, just now I set the focus at 6'.
If I use a lens opening of f/4, only things within 5.5' and 6.5' of me will be in focus.
If I use of lens opening of f/8, now things within 5' and 7.5' of me will be in focus.
If I narrow the aperture all the way to f/22, everything within 4' and 15' of me will be in focus.

If I leave the aperture at f/22 but change the focus to 15', then I can expect everything from 6' on (i.e., 6' to "infinity") to be in focus.
Subject Author Posted

More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley Attachments

davidtltc September 18, 2014 08:48AM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley Attachments

davidtltc September 18, 2014 08:54AM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

Tom Moungovan September 18, 2014 11:08AM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

El Skonk September 18, 2014 09:11AM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

Randall Hess September 18, 2014 10:08AM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

nscaler2 September 18, 2014 10:23AM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

KevinM September 18, 2014 11:29AM

Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

davidtltc September 18, 2014 02:59PM

Re: Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

rehunn September 18, 2014 06:40PM

Need for post processing

trainrider47 September 19, 2014 09:20AM

Zone focusing

John West September 19, 2014 03:45PM

Re: Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

jgunning September 19, 2014 09:27AM

Re: Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

BillD September 19, 2014 09:45AM

Re: Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

Rich Murray September 19, 2014 12:12PM

Re: Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

BillD September 21, 2014 05:31PM

Re: Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

Rich Murray September 22, 2014 11:48AM

Re: Thank You Again Everyone smiling smiley

Chris Walker September 22, 2014 04:19PM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

RDannemann September 19, 2014 08:16AM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

BrianJ September 19, 2014 08:18AM

Re: More Lense questions

Randall Hess September 19, 2014 04:08PM

Re: More Lense questions

Steve Thompson September 19, 2014 04:54PM

Re: More Lense questions

Randall Hess September 19, 2014 05:03PM

Re: More Lense questions

Rich Murray September 20, 2014 06:56AM

Re: More Lense questions

Randall Hess September 20, 2014 09:27AM

Tamron Lense 16-300mm

davidtltc October 01, 2014 08:32PM

Re: Tamron Lense 16-300mm

Randall Hess October 02, 2014 06:07AM

Re: Tamron Lense 16-300mm

trainrider47 October 02, 2014 07:34AM

Re: Tamron Lense 16-300mm

Steve Thompson October 02, 2014 08:14AM

Re: Tamron Lense 16-300mm

KevinM October 02, 2014 03:18PM

Re: Tamron Lense 16-300mm

davidtltc October 02, 2014 08:32AM

Re: Tamron Lense 16-300mm

Randall Hess October 02, 2014 10:25AM

Re: Tamron Lense 16-300mm

trainrider47 October 02, 2014 02:27PM

Re: More Lense questions-Sorry- eye rolling smiley

Eddy Sand October 02, 2014 04:13PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login