Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

August 01, 2014 05:45PM avatar
Jeff Taylor Wrote:
=======================================================
> Who says they can't go that fast?
>
> The K class can easily reach 40+mph. As can some
> of the C class.
> ..............
> Now in the Rio grande days they ran them 35-40mph
> on the straight track south of Salida.

I know that we have had Loop engine 40 at at least 30 MPH uphill ..... she loves to run and the faster she goes, the better she liked it.

I have mentioned before that theoretically, a steam engine has no top end .... again, it is a matter of balance, reciprocating weight, etc.

I got chewed out by Rosa for running too fast on the Loop. smileys with beer

Skip Luke
Switchman (ret): Grand Canyon Railway;
Engineer (ret): Georgetown Loop RR Inc., Sumpter Valley Ry., Monticello & Sangamon Valley;
Dispatcher(ret): Illinois Central, White Pass & Yukon, Burlington Northern Ry.
Mariner, Musician, Miner
Subject Author Posted

Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

kcsivils July 31, 2014 03:50PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

dougvv July 31, 2014 04:24PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

rehunn July 31, 2014 05:43PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

trainrider47 August 01, 2014 08:50AM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

philip.marshall July 31, 2014 07:45PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

stanames July 31, 2014 07:53PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

John Hewlett July 31, 2014 09:05PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

snowtownbob August 01, 2014 04:38AM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

Jeff Taylor August 01, 2014 08:09AM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

Skip August 01, 2014 05:45PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

dougvv August 01, 2014 07:11AM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

jcpatten August 01, 2014 08:08AM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

philip.marshall August 01, 2014 10:11AM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

Bob Foley August 01, 2014 12:05PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft. - NG-15s

kcsivils August 01, 2014 11:27AM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft. - NG-15s

trainrider47 August 01, 2014 12:20PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft. - NG-15s

kcsivils August 01, 2014 12:32PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft. - NG-15s

christensenge August 01, 2014 04:18PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft. - NG-15s

Mr. Ed August 01, 2014 05:19PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft. - NG-15s

christensenge August 01, 2014 09:36PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft. - NG-15s

kcsivils August 01, 2014 05:46PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

jim pallow August 01, 2014 06:05PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

Earl August 01, 2014 07:37PM

Re: Speed debate again - 3 ft. versus 2 ft.

Brian Norden August 01, 2014 09:51PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login