Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

July 07, 2021 05:46PM avatar
Johnson Barr Wrote:
--------------------------------------------------
> p.s.  Another nit-pick, that is NOT noticeable
> from fifty feet away:  With all the professional
> typesetters' fonts like Engravers Roman, the
> rounded numbers like the 0, 3, 6, 8 and 9
> are slightly taller than the 1, 4 and 7; they
> should ALL be aligned on their CENTER-
> LINES, and NOT along their bottoms.
The
> 0, 3, 6, 8 and 9 should ALL have their tops
> slightly above the tops of the 1, 4 & 7, and
> they should ALL have their bottom curves
> aligned slightly below the bottoms of the 1,
> 4, and 7.  The base of the 2 aligns with the
> bases of the 1, 4 and 7 but its top curve is
> a tiny bit above their tops, and the 5 should
> also be aligned according to its centerline,
> not its bottom.

Tank Smith Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is correct — the reason this is done is that
> a zero glyph with the same height as a one glyph
> will appear too small when adjacent . . .

dave2-8-0 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The ascending and descending characters also
> apply to common letters.  So in the case of the
> RR #s one CAN NOT cut 24 " vinyl into 24 inch
> tall letters.  Numbers have to be cut separate or
> use 36" vinyl with a lot of waste.

When Roosso had Design-A-Sign in Pagosa Springs – who have been doing vinyl letters for the C&TS for several years – produce the reproductions of Ernie Robart's 1970 logo for the 40th B.D. party, he fudged it's height & width just a little to keep them within the 24" width of the vinyl cutter they had at the time (see second image on [ngdiscussion.net]).  Assuming they haven't upgraded to a cutter with 30" or 36" capacity, perhaps the numbers should be turned 90° so they're 18" ± a little to fit the cutter sideways, and the 2's, 5's, 6's and 8's can be cut a bit over 24" 'long' (with centerlines printed in the margins for alignment) to maintain the their correct proportions with 24" tall 1's and 4's . . .   eye popping smiley

Brian Norden Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Similar with the alphabet.
>
> I have seen Southern Pacific, Union Pacific (old
> style), and Santa Fe drawings of the letters they
> used on their passenger and other equipment.
> These show the height reference lines and show
> the letters with the rounded top and bottoms (C,
> G, O, Q) extending above & below the reference
> lines.
>
> The extended passenger letterboard letters gen-
> erally follow the reference lines, but the little serif
> at the top end of the "C" even extends above the
> reference line.
>
> I once found a museum volunteer lining up letters
> to a top reference line -- the "C"s in "PACIFIC EL-
> ECTRIC" were hanging way down from where they
> should be!!!


"Tank", Dave and Brian -

Thank You for the moral support!!   At last Roosso and I feel like we're not just spitting in the wind, and (don't tell anyone) we feel like there is going to be some progress made in the next week or two toward providing the Phraud-O-Graphers like Kevin, who are spending BIG bucks to support the C&TS in these trying times, with an historically rewarding experience.

The next step is to determine the most appropriate typefaces for the as-correct-as-reasonably-possible re-numbering of #168 and "#425".     smileys with beer

- Sincerely, Willie  (Wm. Claude Johnson-Barr III, Esq.)   smoking smiley
          "Not All Who Have Cell-Phones Do Twitter*
          "Not All Those Who Ponder Can Think . . . "

          * Only TWITS Twitter!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/07/2021 08:26PM by Johnson Barr.
Subject Author Posted

If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

John Cole April 17, 2013 07:13PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

drgwk37 April 17, 2013 07:24PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

Rich Murray April 17, 2013 08:04PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

CodyAkin April 17, 2013 08:24PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

John West April 17, 2013 08:48PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

dougvv April 17, 2013 10:53PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

Curt Bianchi April 17, 2013 11:58PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

rick_b April 18, 2013 10:43AM

Computer fonts Attachments

John West April 18, 2013 11:06AM

Re: Computer fonts

drgwk37 April 18, 2013 11:30AM

Re: Computer fonts

Stewart Rhine April 18, 2013 12:01PM

Which way did the lettering slant? Attachments

John West April 18, 2013 12:17PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

drgwk37 April 18, 2013 01:00PM

Leaning in to it

John Bush April 18, 2013 05:37PM

Re: Leaning in to it - or leaning away ... confused smiley

Russo Loco April 18, 2013 08:00PM

Speaking of a tip o'the hat Attachments

John West April 18, 2013 08:13PM

Re: Speaking of a tip o'the hat

Russo Loco April 18, 2013 09:55PM

Re: Leaning in to it

drgwk37 April 19, 2013 07:35AM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Fritz Klinke April 18, 2013 04:38PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Russo Loco April 18, 2013 10:48PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Fritz Klinke April 19, 2013 12:00AM

Responsibilities of a curmudgeon

John West April 19, 2013 09:04AM

Re: Another Slant on Lettering ... cool smiley

Russo Loco April 19, 2013 01:28PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

John West April 19, 2013 01:41PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering ... yawning smiley

Russo Loco April 19, 2013 09:16PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering ... yawning smiley

John West April 19, 2013 09:30PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering ... yawning smiley

Russo Loco April 19, 2013 09:56PM

Autocad?

John West April 19, 2013 10:15PM

Re: Autocad?

Russo Loco April 19, 2013 10:35PM

Re: Autocad?

John Cole April 19, 2013 11:20PM

Re: Autocad?

Dick Cowles April 20, 2013 08:26AM

Re: Autocad?

GeorgeGaskill April 26, 2013 04:19PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley Attachments

Johnson Barr July 06, 2021 07:33PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

dave2-8-0 July 07, 2021 09:34AM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

Johnson Barr July 07, 2021 01:30PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

Tank Smith July 07, 2021 02:50PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

dave2-8-0 July 07, 2021 03:29PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

Brian Norden July 07, 2021 04:04PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

Johnson Barr July 07, 2021 05:46PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley Attachments

Tank Smith July 07, 2021 06:26PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

Tank Smith July 07, 2021 07:08PM

Re: Yet another slant on lettering . . . eye popping smiley

Brian Norden July 07, 2021 10:49PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant? Attachments

drgwk37 April 20, 2013 06:56AM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant - and when ... confused smiley

Russo Loco April 20, 2013 12:43PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Earl April 20, 2013 07:59PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

drgwk37 April 20, 2013 08:15PM

Re: Wrong slant on #487 & #497 - starting when?

Russo Loco April 21, 2013 01:02PM

Re: Wrong slant on 497

John West April 21, 2013 01:42PM

Re: Wrong slant on 497 ... since 1963, at least

Russo Loco April 21, 2013 02:46PM

Re: Wrong slant on 497 - since 1963, again ...

Russo Loco April 23, 2013 02:04PM

Re: Wrong slant on #487 & #497 - starting when?

drgwk37 April 21, 2013 02:32PM

Re: Same Old, Same Old - after ANOTHER eight years . . . x(

Johnson Barr July 06, 2021 12:26PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Jon Bentz April 19, 2013 09:45AM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Russo Loco April 19, 2013 01:38PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Fritz Klinke April 19, 2013 04:27PM

Re: Which way did the lettering slant?

Russo Loco April 19, 2013 10:11PM

How come the Rio Grande couldn't get it right?

John Bush April 20, 2013 06:53AM

Re: "Correctly is in the eye of the beholder" ... grinning smiley Attachments

Russo Loco April 27, 2013 02:51PM

Re: How the Rio Grande could get it right ... grinning smiley

John Cole April 27, 2013 04:23PM

Re: Did Steve Fornery get it wrong ... confused smiley

Johnson Barr April 27, 2013 08:53PM

Re: Computer fonts Attachments

Russo Loco July 06, 2021 06:36PM

Creating stencils from photos. was Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance. Attachments

dougvv April 18, 2013 02:49PM

Computer font as baseline is primary concern...

74ford April 20, 2013 06:22PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

jim pallow April 21, 2013 03:44PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

michael July 06, 2021 03:25PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

Earl July 06, 2021 04:50PM

Re: If you wanted the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', there went your chance . . .

Russo Loco July 06, 2021 06:49PM

Re: If you wanted the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', there went your chance . . .

Brian Norden July 06, 2021 07:12PM

Re: If you wanted the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', there went your chance . . .

Johnson Barr July 06, 2021 08:21PM

Re: They don't shrink Tenders, do they . . . x(

Johnson Barr July 06, 2021 06:15PM

Re: They don't shrink Tenders, do they . . . x(

albspng July 06, 2021 07:30PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

michael July 06, 2021 06:07PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

michael July 06, 2021 07:19PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

Casey Akin July 06, 2021 09:46PM

Re: This is how we paint stuff as a museum...

John C July 07, 2021 03:55PM

Re: This is how we paint stuff as a museum . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Johnson Barr July 07, 2021 06:03PM

Re: This is how we paint stuff as a museum . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Russo Loco July 07, 2021 08:18PM

Re: This is how we paint stuff as a museum . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Brian Norden July 07, 2021 11:16PM

Re: This is how we paint stuff as a museum...

dave2-8-0 July 07, 2021 08:33PM

Stencil Status?

Adam Phillips July 08, 2021 12:22AM

Re: Stencil Status?

drgwk37 July 08, 2021 06:58AM

Re: Stencil Status?

Adam Phillips July 08, 2021 01:23PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance. Attachments

Jeff Taylor July 09, 2021 05:49PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

davidtltc July 09, 2021 07:08PM

Yellow Paint Era

hank July 10, 2021 09:22AM

Re: Yellow Paint Eradrinking smiley

davidtltc July 10, 2021 11:59AM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

trainrider47 July 10, 2021 09:23AM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

dave2-8-0 July 10, 2021 10:04AM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance.

Tank Smith July 10, 2021 10:08AM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', here is your chance. Attachments

Joe Weigman July 10, 2021 12:07PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', Go Grande Gold

davidtltc July 10, 2021 12:14PM

Re: If you want the CATS locomotives lettered/numbered 'correctly', Go Grande Gold

rainbowroute July 10, 2021 08:15PM

Colorado Gold

davidtltc July 11, 2021 07:25AM

Re: Is it time two leaf well enough alone?

Johnson Barr July 10, 2021 12:50PM

Re: Is it time two leaf well enough alone?

Jeff Taylor July 10, 2021 06:00PM

Re: Is it time two leaf well enough alone? Attachments

CR BT Dispr July 10, 2021 07:51PM

Re: Is it time two leaf well enough alone?

dave2-8-0 July 10, 2021 10:07PM

Re: Is it time two leaf well enough alone?

CR BT Dispr July 11, 2021 04:20AM

Re: Is it time two leaf well enough alone? Attachments

dave2-8-0 July 11, 2021 08:42AM

What is reflecting in the Shadows?

davidtltc July 11, 2021 08:56AM

Re: What is reflecting in the Shadows?

dave2-8-0 July 11, 2021 09:08AM

Re: What is reflecting in the Shadows?

Tank Smith July 11, 2021 09:21AM

Re: What is reflecting in the Shadows?

dave2-8-0 July 11, 2021 09:45AM

Re: What is reflecting in the Shadows?

Jeff Taylor July 11, 2021 08:26PM

Re: What Color is reflecting in the Shadows?

Russo Loco July 11, 2021 09:33PM

Y 4 now would it be time 2 (Gold) leaf it alone, I plead the 5th?Crying

davidtltc July 11, 2021 09:31PM

Re: Is it time two (Gold) Leaf it alone four now? . . . smileys with beer Attachments

Russo Loco July 11, 2021 08:29PM

Re: Is it time two (Gold) Leaf it alone four now? . . . smileys with beer

rainbowroute July 11, 2021 10:48PM

Re: All that is GREEN doth not glitter . . . x(

Russo Loco July 12, 2021 12:38PM

Re: Is it time two (Gold) Leaf it alone four now? . . . smileys with beer Attachments

dave2-8-0 July 12, 2021 12:10PM

Re: Is it time two (Gold) Leaf it alone four now? . . . smileys with beer

davidtltc July 12, 2021 12:34PM

Re: It's time two (Gold) Leaf it alone four now . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Russo Loco July 12, 2021 12:53PM

Re: It's time two (Gold) Leaf it alone four now . . . thumbs upthumbs up

davidtltc July 12, 2021 01:37PM

Re: It's time two (Gold) Leaf it alone four now . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Tank Smith July 12, 2021 04:47PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login