Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 1744

January 21, 2013 10:54PM
Well, Russ, having spent 3 seasons with the Colorado Central Narrow Gauge Railroad/Georgetown Loop #40 (now at the CRRM), I can tell you that you can not fire an oil burner on a substantial grade without emitting a fairly strong "haze" from the stack. If you try to run with a clear stack such as that shown in your photo, you will be stopping somewhere on the hill to blow up steam. At the CRRM, the coal-burning #318 emits (IMHO) less visible smoke when burning the coal from the King mine at Hesperus than the #40 on oil, unless you are actively bailing coal into the #318's firebox or are moving away from a station stop. In years past the CRRM's neighbors have complained to the county health department about the smoke. We excuse ourselves in the name of history.

PS. Have you checked out modern diesel locomotives lately? They emit virtually no visible smoke, and when Tier III emissions rules kick in, those locomotives' exhaust will be as clear as modern diesel trucks, thanks to urea exhaust fluid injection. No emissions systems are required for steam locomotives--yet.

Mike
Subject Author Posted

1744

michael January 17, 2013 09:21PM

Re: 1744

SCVR66 January 18, 2013 04:49PM

Re: 1744

rehunn January 19, 2013 11:22AM

Re: 1744

Russo Loco January 21, 2013 10:09PM

Re: 1744

mikerowe January 21, 2013 10:54PM

Re: 1744

John Cole January 22, 2013 12:02AM

Re: 1744

Tomstp January 22, 2013 09:14AM

Re: 1744

JS Driver January 22, 2013 11:21AM

Re: 1744

Donald Foster January 22, 2013 03:08PM

Re: 1744

Tomstp January 22, 2013 04:15PM

Re: 1744

mikerowe January 23, 2013 01:36AM

Re: 1744 Attachments

Everett Lueck January 23, 2013 08:47AM

Re: 1744 Attachments

robert yuill January 22, 2013 07:07PM

Re: 1744

Tomstp January 22, 2013 08:23PM

Re: 1744

John Cole January 22, 2013 08:35PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login