Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

October 16, 2012 01:50PM
Tim is being a little pessimistic here. It is true that we have higher priorities but many of them, like the #19 and backshop, are relitively small projects and will soon be accomplished. The 19, for instance, is fully funded and just waiting for the boiler contractor to install the tubes and replacement firebox sheets. We still hope this will be completed in time for the Christmas trains. The Sumpter loop is fairly expensive, but we have a plan for a much cheaper temporary loop.

Before we consider anything like building a locomotive from scratch though, we will have to restore #20, finish restoring #720, and do a complete overhaul on #3. We also need to make some improvments on our McEwen yard.

The proposed 4% grade was not really the main reason for wanting to build a replica 2-6-6-2 however. The 19 and 20 were rated at 170 tons each on the 4.08% ruling grade up to Larch, and it will (sadly) likely be a long time before our passenger trains approach that weight. Anyway the steepest gradient is relatively short and we could double it or use a helper for an occasional extra heavy train. The idea in the "Baby Mallets" (Yes, I know) is as an attraction more than a necessity. Anyway, the preliminary cost estimate for the "Union Creek Extension" is about six times the estimate for a Replica 2-6-6-2.

Tim is correct that the plan is to build two versions. Aside from the tender frame and running gear the difference between the two is just sheet metal, and once the plans and paterns are completed it would not be that much more to produce two copies. It is oue intent to partner with someone on this, though it does not have to be the Loop.

I do not intend to demean Tim in any way. I consider him to be a friend and valued compatriot. But he was not here in the early days when about all we heard was "you will never do it". The good folks at Sumpter continued to say this until they actually saw the head light, at which time the tune became "so, what are you going to do for the community".

The point of this ramble is this: If anyone thinks we can't do it, I would ask them to take a tour of our yard and line. Then consider that we have never had more than a dozen active volunters and, except for a few special projects, no paid employees. Furthermore, our annual gross operating income has never exceeded that of a lower middle class household.

So, anyone want to bet against us?
Subject Author Posted

If money was no problem

HogandTow October 15, 2012 02:14AM

Re: If money was no problem

South Park October 15, 2012 04:59AM

Re: If money was no problem

weston1879 October 15, 2012 08:13AM

Re: If money was no problem

South Park October 15, 2012 08:23AM

Re: If money was no problem

hank October 15, 2012 09:49AM

Re: If money was no problem

Tower Operator October 15, 2012 11:54AM

Re: If money was no problem Attachments

Jeff Ramsey October 15, 2012 12:32PM

Re: If money was no problem Attachments

Jeff Ramsey October 15, 2012 12:51PM

Re: If money was no problem

Tower Operator October 15, 2012 02:28PM

Re: Scrap drive

Jim Grigsby October 17, 2012 04:13PM

Re: If money was no problem

Jason Rose October 15, 2012 09:39AM

Re: If money was no problem

Tower Operator October 15, 2012 11:55AM

Re: If money was no problem

Jason Rose October 15, 2012 11:56AM

Re: If money was no problem

Tower Operator October 16, 2012 02:19PM

Re: If money was no problem

mikerowe October 15, 2012 01:34PM

Re: If money was no problem

dougvv October 15, 2012 01:48PM

Re: If money was no problem

mikerowe October 15, 2012 01:52PM

Re: If money was no problem

Ed Stabler October 15, 2012 02:03PM

Re: If money was no problem

hank October 16, 2012 01:34PM

Re: If money was no problem Attachments

Jeff Ramsey October 15, 2012 02:33PM

Re: If money was no problem

dougvv October 15, 2012 05:13PM

Re: If money was no problem

jalbers October 15, 2012 09:49AM

Re: If money was no problem

ND Holmes October 15, 2012 03:07PM

Re: If money was no problem Attachments

Jeff Ramsey October 15, 2012 03:52PM

Re: If money was no problem

dougvv October 15, 2012 05:19PM

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

Tim Bain October 16, 2012 05:15AM

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

Jim Grigsby October 16, 2012 01:50PM

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

Tim Bain October 16, 2012 04:43PM

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

dougvv October 16, 2012 05:14PM

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

J.B.Bane October 16, 2012 08:52PM

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

dougvv October 16, 2012 10:56PM

Re: 2-6-6-2s on the New SVRR

Jim Grigsby October 16, 2012 02:23PM

Re: 2-8-0s on the New SVRR, SN Attachments

Jeff Ramsey October 17, 2012 03:12PM

Re: Speaking of the Sumpter Valley...

Tom Moungovan October 17, 2012 05:41PM

Re: Speaking of the Sumpter Valley...

Jim Grigsby October 17, 2012 05:49PM

Re: Speaking of the Sumpter Valley...

J.B.Bane October 17, 2012 05:56PM

Re: Speaking of the Sumpter Valley...

Tom Moungovan October 17, 2012 08:08PM

Re: If money was no problem

Ed Stabler October 15, 2012 03:55PM

sorry, but

hank October 15, 2012 09:56AM

Re: If money was no problem

nedsn3 October 15, 2012 06:46PM

Re: If money was no problem

rehunn October 15, 2012 07:58PM

Re: If money was no problem

John Sporseen October 15, 2012 08:32PM

Re: If money was no problem

weston1879 October 15, 2012 11:53PM

Re: If money was no problem

dougvv October 16, 2012 12:55AM

Re: If money was no problem

hank October 16, 2012 01:50PM

Re: If money was no problem

Jim Grigsby October 17, 2012 04:27PM

Re: If money was no problem

Tom Moungovan October 18, 2012 12:23AM

Re: If money was no problem

hank October 18, 2012 11:49AM

Re: If money was no problem

dougvv October 17, 2012 09:14PM

Re: Axle loading

Jim Grigsby October 18, 2012 08:14PM

Re: If money was no problem

skidmk October 15, 2012 09:09PM

Re: If money was no problem

South Park October 15, 2012 10:24PM

Re: If money was no problem

South Park October 15, 2012 10:32PM

Re: If money was no problem

weston1879 October 16, 2012 12:02AM

Re: If money was no problem

South Park October 16, 2012 06:45AM

Re: If money was no problem

Jim Grigsby October 17, 2012 06:05PM

Re: If money was no problem

CraigjP October 17, 2012 04:52AM

Re: If money was no problem

Ryan Masecar October 17, 2012 01:36PM

Re: If money was no problem

nnsteam October 17, 2012 08:10PM

Re: If money were no problem ... eye popping smiley Attachments

Russo Loco November 06, 2012 01:43AM

Re: If money was no problem

Dirk Ramsey November 06, 2012 03:01AM

Re: If money was no problem

Rick Steele November 06, 2012 10:21AM

Re: If money were no problem ...

Russo Loco November 06, 2012 11:50AM

Re: If money was no problem

Rick Steele November 06, 2012 10:21AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login