Guys...I'm not disputing that CTSMC made the right decision for further testing. Sounds very prudent. Good marks, doing their job here.
But, why does it take a SECOND firm to do it, consuming even more time?
The first one was not qualified?
Or, is industry protocol to divide general inspection from actual testing? Boy, this is getting expensive!!
See, this is another, obvious to me, reason why there needs to be a regular newsflow about what decisions are made, what will happen, setting predicted timelines, etc. Doesn't have to be every day.
You REALLY want to keep employees, the public, ON YOUR SIDE!
It's obvious nobody in the decision-making/control loop even thinks this necessary.
Or, is somebody hiding something??
Having been in the news biz, this is incredible to me.
Edited 6 time(s). Last edit at 07/19/2010 02:26PM by Abqfoamer.