Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

January 27, 2010 08:53PM avatar
Exactly. I've always pictured wikipedia as a casual information site, and some of the information has to be taken with a grain of salt. That being said, I felt information found on the D&S page used that style of writing to an advantage. The big giveaway on information I tend not to trust is when someone chimes in with an opinion rather that stating facts.

In no way did I intend for a particular railroad to be singled out or put one above the other by the way.
Subject Author Posted

Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia, but people read it...

John C January 22, 2010 02:59PM

Re: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia, but people read it...

K-27 Afficianado January 22, 2010 10:48PM

Re: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia, but people read it...

John C January 23, 2010 08:00AM

NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

Philosopher January 27, 2010 03:55PM

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

John C January 27, 2010 08:53PM

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

BobHuddleston January 27, 2010 08:58PM

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

John West January 27, 2010 09:34PM

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

K-27 Afficianado January 27, 2010 10:32PM

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

Steve Singer January 28, 2010 01:32PM

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

george pearce January 28, 2010 06:17PM

Re: NNG: Wikipedia... not a real encylopedia. Really?

Philosopher January 29, 2010 08:57AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login