Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

The $64 question isn't what you posted

HKA
August 23, 2001 07:09PM
Gee, what would be worse? Shutting down the EBT, perhaps never to run again, or letting it stagger inexorably into the future until their luck runs out, and someone gets killed? I would say the latter, because that may have repercussions that could destroy the entire steam railroading industry, if not through knee-jerk legislation, then through sky-high insurance rates.
The argument that since they can’t afford to maintain their equipment, they shouldn’t be regulated holds no water. If someone got pulled over for an out of date inspection sticker, should the cop let them go just because they say that they are a deadbeat and can’t afford to maintain their car? Should only rich people be forced to have their cars inspected? Even though they are driving on the same roads? B---S---! If it costs X amount to play the game, then be prepared to pay it, or get out. If you don’t then you are a hazard to yourself, and everyone in the vicinity
The new steam rule is much more then a slip of paper. It is a comprehensive package to inspect and determine the strength of every last part of a locomotive boiler. It was created in very large part by experts in steam railroading, easily the most knowledgeable people in the country regarding locomotive boilers, with the goal of seeing these old engines into the indefinite future. It is set up for seasonal operation, and is much friendlier to present day operators the old rule was.
The inspections by PA are a “cross your fingers ‘til the hydro’s over” farce. Nobody really knows the condition of the interior of some of the boilers, because they have never had all of their tubes removed since before 1956. That’s forty years of operation with no inspection. When most boilers of that age are thoroughly inspected, they are threatened with having their pressure reduced due to thinning of the steel plates. When PA did a “thorough” inspection several years ago the boilers were “uprated” to 200 PSI. No kidding, it’s stamped on the backheads. Baldwin said that they were good for 180 PSI back before WWI. So have all those years of operation on creek water made them stronger than when new? Of course not. What it means is that somebody screwed up their calculations. So, is the boiler safe, or not? Literally, nobody knows.
Subject Author Posted

Trevor's EBT Questions

Erik Ledbetter August 21, 2001 04:56PM

unwieldy?

me August 21, 2001 05:17PM

Re: Trevor's EBT Questions

Mik August 21, 2001 06:58PM

FRA Compliant?

Bob Keller August 21, 2001 07:29PM

Re: FRA Compliant?

Trevor Hartford August 21, 2001 09:23PM

Intermodal economics

Mik August 22, 2001 10:21AM

Re: Intermodal economics

Rick Renz August 22, 2001 10:34AM

Re: Intermodal economics

Mik August 22, 2001 10:55AM

Re: Trevor's EBT Questions

Martin Dickson August 22, 2001 06:00PM

easements, and new cars

Mik August 22, 2001 06:25PM

Re: easements, and new cars

G. W. Laepple August 23, 2001 06:39AM

The REAL $64 question

Mik August 23, 2001 11:41AM

Re: The REAL $64 question

Erik Ledbetter August 23, 2001 12:33PM

A thought

mik August 23, 2001 01:19PM

Re: A thought

Erik Ledbetter August 23, 2001 01:25PM

Re: A thought

Mik August 23, 2001 02:17PM

The $64 question isn't what you posted

HKA August 23, 2001 07:09PM

I give up.... *PIC*

Mik August 23, 2001 09:17PM

Re: The $64 question isn't what you posted

Jerry Huck August 27, 2001 08:48PM

Re: The $64 question isn't what you posted

HKA August 28, 2001 04:21PM

Re: The $64 question isn't what you posted

BBrinton August 28, 2001 05:14PM

Re: The $64 question isn't what you posted

HKA August 30, 2001 04:36AM

Re: The REAL $64 question

O.Anderson August 23, 2001 01:14PM

Re: The REAL $64 question

DvV August 23, 2001 06:53PM

Re: easements, and new cars

Allen Tacy August 23, 2001 04:50PM

Wrong, Alan

John Craft August 24, 2001 05:51AM

Re: Wrong, Alan

Allen Tacy August 24, 2001 01:08PM

Re: Wrong, Alan

HKA August 24, 2001 04:01PM

Re: FRA reg C&TS

PRR August 27, 2001 09:24PM

Re: FRA reg C&TS

HKA August 28, 2001 04:16PM

Re: FRA reg C&TS

PRR August 28, 2001 11:15PM

Re: FRA reg LK&P

Fred August 29, 2001 01:06PM

FRA's jurisdiction

An observer August 29, 2001 02:30PM

Re: FRA's jurisdiction

Mik August 29, 2001 03:39PM

Re: FRA's jurisdiction

Fred August 30, 2001 04:35AM

FRA 230.2 John si! Allen no!

Michael Allen August 26, 2001 08:56PM

Re: Trevor's EBT Questions

John Fisher August 22, 2001 06:35PM

Re: Trevor's EBT Questions

Martin Dickson August 23, 2001 04:13AM

Re: Trevor's EBT Questions

PRR August 22, 2001 08:53PM

Re: Trevor's EBT Questions

Martin Dickson August 23, 2001 04:31AM

Re: Martin Dickson misunderstandings

PRR August 23, 2001 07:03AM

Re: PRR misunderstandings

Earl Pitts August 23, 2001 08:25PM

Let's not be too hasty to dismiss intermodal...

Sarducci August 22, 2001 10:12AM

Another Opportunity . . .

Crayuft August 22, 2001 11:24AM

Here's our UP strategy

Sarducci August 22, 2001 12:14PM

REAL intermodal foolishness

Bob Yarger August 22, 2001 03:03PM

Re: Here's our UP strategy

DvV August 22, 2001 04:04PM

Re: Let's not be too hasty to dismiss intermodal..

Martin Luther August 23, 2001 09:17PM

Re: Let's not be too hasty to dismiss intermodal..

Paul D August 24, 2001 01:42PM

Re: Let's not be too hasty to dismiss intermodal.. *PIC*

Bill Kepner August 26, 2001 03:30PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.