Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-28s

March 24, 2009 01:42PM
Once again, from a previous thread on this forum:

Best and Worst K-28 Locomotives

This critique is in response to Mike Trent's request. These handsome engines with the homely face are perhaps the most familiar to railfans, as they have operated continuously since their delivery from American Locomotive in 1923, on the king of the tourist roads, the Silverton. Crews liked these engines the best of any other 2-8-2s. They were excellent riders and had very responsive throttles, gaining them the moniker "sports models". You could run them at higher speeds than the two bigger classes K-36 and 37, and for that reason were often found holding down passenger assignments as well as taking over the very long run from Alamosa to Santa Fe from the big-drivered class T-12s. The good riding capabilities obviously come from the trailing truck being directly under the cab, not having the overhang the bigger engines had. They were touchy engines to fire , as they had a smaller firebox and the Master Mechanic front end baffle system, which I felt was inferior to the Cyclone design the in the 80s and 90s. The way these engines liked to be fired was a huge pile in the back of the firebox, by the door, and almost nothing, and I mean nothing in the front.

473. This is perhaps the most photographed of all narrow gauge engines in the world. Otto Perry took over 1100 photos of this engine alone. It saw lots of use. Like many 2-8-2s, it worked out of Salida. Later it ran on the line to Old Santa Fe. It worked the San Juan the most frequently. It also received the first fake stack and the "Grande Gold" paint job. An interesting aside- Ernie Ross (the Grande's lead painter) told me the officials were very interested in how the 1950 paint job would look. They said they planned to paint all passenger engines, steam and diesel, this color. As it turned out, the diesel units did receive the paint design. 473 was in a couple of bad derailments, but it always was a very smooth rider. At some point it reportedly received the valves of a 480- and old-timers claimed it could pull as much as a 480. Like the 478, the 473 received a power reverse in the early 1950s. This was because the Grande anticipated the downgrading of these engines to Durango switchers, and because some very old engineers requested them. They were not successful as the heavy trains and steep climb up to Silverton caused back pressure from running gear to beat against the power reverse, ruining the seals and minimizing the ability to hold a setting properly. So in the 1980s the 473 and 478 received conventional manual cutoffs.

476. This was the favorite. It ran well and always had a manual cutoff. It was used in freight service on Cumbres as late as 1967. All three of the remaining 470s were badly abused by the D&RGW as the Silverton became more popular. The tapered cylinder bolts worked loose and the cylinders worked loose from the frame and the smokebox. This situation got worse, causing its retirement in the 1990s.

478. "The Lumber Wagon". This rig has the longest history on the SIlverton Branch, being photograped in the late 1930s on the line.( The first K-class ran up there in 1928, after heavier rail was laid) It was the first to receive a power reverse, in 1950. For some reason it rode harder than the other two engines, picking up and telegraphing each joint on the railroad. Also it could pull a little less than the other two. Naturally, this was the engine I always caught! Like most of the engines I worked, it would respond well to an engineer who coaxed it.

The consensus was that this class was badly abused, and were the most worn-out of the 2-8-2s. Alco was a good builder, but these engines were a little harder to repair than 480s, especially in running gear work. These engines each went through three fireboxes. This is from abuse, but also from the box being maybe too small for the engine size. The engines certainly could not hold a fire as long as the 80s or 90s. They were very comfortable engines to work on. The fireman had a level firing floor as well as a high firebox door to throw into. Also the coal didn't have to go far. The engineer had a well-placed throttle. Due to its long stack, it was a clean engine to work on.

Little is known of the 7 K-28s that went to Alaska. 470 had a reputation as a poor steamer. 474 was the only engine in the class that was never set up for passenger service (steam heat and alarm system), and it was a regular freight hog out of Gunnison.

All in all these were great engines to work on. It is a shame they we so beat-up.

El Coke


Yes, this is some great stuff, that I why I copied it to keep it handy.

Dennis
Subject Author Posted

Reputations of indiv. K-36s

K-27 Afficianado March 23, 2009 09:52PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

John C March 23, 2009 10:34PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

K-27 Afficianado March 24, 2009 08:20AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

John Cole March 24, 2009 10:59AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

Anonymous User March 24, 2009 06:02PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

John Cole March 26, 2009 11:04AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

Ed Stabler March 24, 2009 06:06AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

hank March 24, 2009 10:14AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

Dennis Tebo March 24, 2009 10:28AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

Will Gant March 24, 2009 01:13PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-28s

Dennis Tebo March 24, 2009 01:42PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-28s

myork March 24, 2009 02:32PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Dennis Tebo March 24, 2009 01:53PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

K-27 Afficianado March 24, 2009 05:04PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Dennis Tebo March 24, 2009 05:28PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Todd Hohlenkamp March 26, 2009 09:57AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Dennis Tebo March 26, 2009 10:14AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

drgwk37 March 26, 2009 10:52AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Earl March 26, 2009 11:48AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

drgwk37 March 26, 2009 01:34PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Earl March 26, 2009 01:52PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

drgwk37 March 26, 2009 02:27PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Swissboy March 27, 2009 05:30PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Dennis Tebo March 27, 2009 10:27PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Swissboy March 29, 2009 08:36AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

drgwk37 March 30, 2009 06:39PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

dandtsrr2 March 31, 2009 11:38PM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-37s

Dennis Tebo April 01, 2009 08:26AM

Re: Reputations of indiv. K-36s

John K November 21, 2020 04:58PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login