Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

September 09, 2008 02:43PM
CJ,
I think that the real point here is that in spite of, or without regard to, what the standards said employees at certain terminals painted things the way they wanted to.

If you look at the big picture we really only have photos from a few days in the life of any of this stuff, and then mostly right at the end.

What is clear to me is that even the employees of the Rio Grande only "more or less" followed the rules.

A strict following of the "specs" serves only to give a "modelers view" of the real railroad. I suppose you could paint and letter stuff just like it was on October 23, 1954 or any other date for which you have a photo but it may well be wrong for any other day or year.

The railroad as a living and breathing entity is far more interesting than any frozen moment in time.

This discussion is an example of why I am glad we lettered the stuff Cumbres and Toltec and why I'm glad my time there ended before the internet got rolling.

Just my opinion.
Respectfully
John Bush
Subject Author Posted

SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453) Attachments

Chatzi473 September 08, 2008 03:59PM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

Fred Folk September 08, 2008 04:26PM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

AGreene September 08, 2008 08:26PM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

Chatzi473 September 08, 2008 09:36PM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

Coyote September 09, 2008 10:40AM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

dougvv September 09, 2008 01:13PM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

Chile John September 09, 2008 02:04PM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

dougvv September 09, 2008 02:13PM

Re: SILVER anyone (not 489 but 453)

John Bush September 09, 2008 02:43PM

purple, with daisies

hank September 10, 2008 10:03AM

Re: purple, with daisies

jalbers September 10, 2008 11:11AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login