Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

July 11, 2001 07:21AM
Curtis,
As you probably know, Baldwin advertised the top speed of an 8-18C at 40 mph. Some years ago I took Eureka down to the US Gypsum railroad out of El Centro and did test runs there. They have 100 pound rail and I was able to get Eureka up to about 39 mph. The locomotive ran very smoothly, but the limiting factor as I found it was the tender. The water is not baffled in the tank, and it sets up so much side sway that it literally pitched some wood over the side! That was enough for me. I have never had it that fast since, and have no desire to do so again......Baldwin was right on their calculations.
If someone got a ng 4-4-0 going 50 mph on 35 or 40 pound rail,I bet they had to change their underwear afterwards!
Cheers!
Dan
Subject Author Posted

Locomotive speed

Danny July 05, 2001 06:16PM

Re: Locomotive speed

Bob Keller July 05, 2001 08:21PM

Re: Locomotive speed

Trevor Hartford July 05, 2001 09:12PM

Re: Locomotive speed

Frank Martindell July 06, 2001 11:14AM

Re: Locomotive speed

Michael Allen July 07, 2001 04:25PM

Re: Locomotive speed

Herb Kelsey July 07, 2001 07:45PM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

Rick Steele July 07, 2001 08:00PM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

rdmstr July 07, 2001 10:19PM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

Herb Kelsey July 08, 2001 12:22AM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

rdmstr July 08, 2001 12:34AM

Re: 130 mph freight, no way!

Michael Allen July 08, 2001 09:59AM

Re: 130 mph freight, no way!

Curtis F. July 09, 2001 09:38AM

Re: 130 mph freight, no way!

Rick Steele July 09, 2001 04:50PM

Re: 130 mph freight, per Kindig, no way!

Michael Allen July 09, 2001 09:08PM

Re: 130 mph freight, per Kindig, no way!

Rick Steele July 10, 2001 07:56AM

Re: 130 mph freight, per Kindig, no way!

rdmstr July 10, 2001 06:12PM

Re: 130 mph freight, per Kindig, no way!

Rick Steele July 10, 2001 07:26PM

Re: 130 mph freight, per Kindig, no way!

Mike Ramsey July 10, 2001 09:32PM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

Chile John July 11, 2001 10:32AM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

Steffen Rosmus July 08, 2001 12:17PM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

Rick Steele July 09, 2001 04:45PM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

Steffen Rosmus July 10, 2001 12:51AM

Re: Locomotive speed - 1.1 doesn't work

Rick Steele July 10, 2001 08:12AM

Re: Locomotive speed

Jim Adams July 11, 2001 09:53PM

Re: Locomotive speed

Marty Knox July 06, 2001 06:41PM

Re: Locomotive speed

Rob Gram July 07, 2001 08:08PM

Re: Locomotive speed

DvV July 07, 2001 08:43PM

Re: Locomotive speed

Allen Tacy July 08, 2001 10:29AM

1875 4-4-0s

Herb Kelsey July 08, 2001 03:43PM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Curtis F. July 09, 2001 09:12AM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Trevor Hartford July 09, 2001 02:24PM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Trevor Hartford July 10, 2001 08:01PM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Curtis F. July 10, 2001 08:09PM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Trevor Hartford July 12, 2001 12:33PM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Dan Markoff July 11, 2001 07:21AM

I never said it was a good idea. *NM* *NM*

Curtis F. July 11, 2001 08:11AM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

earl the artifact abuser July 11, 2001 05:57PM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Dan Markoff July 11, 2001 07:36PM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Tom Shreve July 13, 2001 12:03AM

Re: 1875 4-4-0s

Bob Keller July 13, 2001 01:39PM

Ben Greathouse

Bob Keller July 08, 2001 11:00AM

Re: Ben Greathouse

Rob Gram July 08, 2001 08:33PM

Re: Ben Greathouse

Chile John July 11, 2001 10:28AM

Re: Ben Greathouse

Rich Muth July 11, 2001 11:25AM

Re: Ben Greathouse

Chile John July 11, 2001 11:37AM

Re: Speed

Rich Muth July 11, 2001 11:37AM

Locomotive speed.. Just between us

Rick Steele July 09, 2001 04:59PM

Re: Locomotive speed.. Just between us

Steven H July 12, 2001 04:54PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.