Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Realities?

Kevin
July 02, 2001 09:54AM
I would be surprised in the USG locomotives would not go through the tunnels if a Alco 101 would. These locomotives were built for the White Pass which closed before they could be delivered. Thus, the loco's had to clear the same clearances the other White Pass loco's did. The White Pass has two tunnels like the C&TS.
The fourth of the batch, the 114, eventually made it to Skagway where it is in work service and seems to do just fine. 111, 112, and 113, went to USG. 113 was destroyed in an unfortunate "derailment" as the D&RGW would say.
C&TS would be better off with one of the supercabs as the Alco's were supposedly despised by the White Pass train crews and track crews. Because of how their trucks were mounted they were very difficult to turn and really tore up the track on the hill from Skagway. They supposedly did fine on the relatively flat and straight track from Bennett to Whitehorse.
The supercab MLW DL535E have Alco 251D prime movers with GGTA19PB1 generators. They weigh in at 216 Metric tons and are 53'5.5" long. They develop 43,200 lbs. of tractive effort, 64,200 lbs. of starting tractive effort, and develop 1200 horsepower. These loco's carry 1000 gallons of fuel. They also have different trucks and are much easier to turn and do not tear up the track like the Alco's.
I would say that one of these locomotives could handle the work train and rescue duties for the C&TS. However, if USG does phase out their operations, I would be surprised if the White Pass did not go after these locomotives. They purchased back all of the Alco's they sold to a South American railroad.
Personally, I think a 90 class would be better on the track but I seriously doubt the White Pass would let go of one of these.
Subject Author Posted

An odd sight at Cumbres *PIC*

jaybawb June 24, 2001 06:17PM

Re: A GOOD sight at Cumbres

Brian Norden June 24, 2001 07:58PM

Re: A GOOD sight at Cumbres

jaybawb June 24, 2001 10:21PM

Re: A GOOD sight at Cumbres

Brian Norden June 26, 2001 01:13AM

Re: A GOOD sight at Cumbres

jaybawb June 26, 2001 01:35AM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

Rich Muth June 24, 2001 09:00PM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

jaybawb June 24, 2001 10:27PM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

Boris Serena June 25, 2001 12:27AM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

jaybawb June 25, 2001 07:28AM

The 6200 Flat?

Kevin Cook June 25, 2001 09:01AM

Re: The 6200 Flat?

Boris Serena June 25, 2001 10:12AM

Re: The 6200 Flat?

Kevin Cook June 25, 2001 10:26AM

Pineapple?

Bob Keller June 25, 2001 09:34AM

Re: Pineapple?

jaybawb June 25, 2001 03:13PM

The 'Pineapple' it has always been...

Herb Kelsey June 25, 2001 04:00PM

Did it look like this? *PIC*

Carl Hess June 25, 2001 06:17PM

Re: Did it look like this?

Bob Keller June 25, 2001 11:33PM

Re: Did it look like this?

R.E. Hess June 30, 2001 06:39PM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

Jim Burrill June 25, 2001 10:02AM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

Bill Kepner June 25, 2001 11:10AM

19

DvV June 25, 2001 07:45PM

Re: 19

jaybawb June 25, 2001 08:54PM

Re: 19

Boris Serena June 26, 2001 12:34AM

Turbocharger?

Don Richter June 26, 2001 07:47AM

Re: Turbocharger?

Fred T June 26, 2001 08:11AM

Re: Turbocharger?

Boris Serena June 26, 2001 08:22AM

Re: Turbocharger?

jaybawb June 26, 2001 08:28AM

Re: Turbocharger?

Boris Serena June 26, 2001 08:36AM

Re: Turbocharger?

jaybawb June 26, 2001 08:55AM

Re: Turbocharger?

Mark Valerius June 30, 2001 09:50AM

Re: Turbocharger?

Wade Hall June 30, 2001 11:07AM

Re: Turbocharger?

John West June 30, 2001 01:24PM

Re: Turbocharger?

R.E Hess June 30, 2001 02:32PM

FRA standards for diesels

John West June 30, 2001 02:59PM

Re: FRA standards for diesels

Mark Valerius June 30, 2001 03:30PM

Re: Turbocharger?

Mark Valerius June 30, 2001 03:36PM

Re: Turbocharger?

John Hammond June 30, 2001 08:32PM

Motor Covers

Brian Norden July 01, 2001 05:15PM

Re: Turbocharger?

Jim Burrill June 26, 2001 08:17AM

Re: Turbocharger?

rdmstr June 26, 2001 10:38AM

Re: 19

John Hammond June 26, 2001 08:29PM

Re: 19

jaybawb June 26, 2001 08:57PM

A partial answer

Brian Norden June 25, 2001 08:59PM

MU'ing

DvV June 26, 2001 02:56PM

Re: MU'ing

Brian Norden June 27, 2001 12:44AM

Re: 19

Grant Houston June 26, 2001 06:05PM

Re: 19

Jessica Stacey June 28, 2001 07:30PM

Re: 19

Mike Oestreich June 29, 2001 09:26AM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

Kevin June 26, 2001 01:31PM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

Fred T June 26, 2001 02:05PM

Re: An odd sight at Cumbres

jaybawb June 26, 2001 02:59PM

Realities?

Bob Keller June 27, 2001 09:38AM

Re: Realities?

jaybawb June 27, 2001 10:18AM

Re: Realities?

Joseph Wessel July 02, 2001 01:55AM

Re: Realities?

Boris Serena July 02, 2001 02:33AM

Re: Realities?

joseph wessel July 02, 2001 02:39AM

Re: Realities?

Kevin July 02, 2001 09:38AM

Re: Realities?

Kevin July 02, 2001 09:54AM

Re: Realities?

Boris Serena July 02, 2001 10:56AM

Re: Realities? *PIC*

joseph wessel July 02, 2001 02:23PM

Re: Realities?

Mike Oestreich July 02, 2001 06:17PM

Re: Realities?

tim olson July 02, 2001 03:08PM

Re: Realities?

Kevin July 02, 2001 03:58PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.