Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 487 not to run again?

May 06, 2008 08:07PM avatar
Another thing to think about, 483 has not run in over 20 years. and she went down with firebox problems if memory serves me correctly. So would the shops not only have to pretty much fix the same problems either way, but 483 would need an extensive amount of extra work.

My opinion, (doubtful that this rumor is true at all), the C&TS would be better off starting on 463 if 487 really has that bad of a problem.

Casey
Subject Author Posted

487 not to run again?

Bill M. May 02, 2008 09:34PM

Re: 487 not to run again?

GFDMatt May 02, 2008 09:38PM

Re: 487 not to run again?

Bill M. May 02, 2008 10:24PM

Re: 487 not to run again?

Mike B May 03, 2008 06:32AM

Re: 487 not to run again?

John Cole May 03, 2008 08:10AM

Re: 487 not to run again?

mschur,488 May 03, 2008 07:48AM

Re: 487 not to run again--that's crap...

drgwk37 May 03, 2008 07:48AM

Re: 487 not to run again?

Ed Stabler May 03, 2008 08:01AM

Steam locomotives are not living creatures, they just seem alive

Yosemite Sam May 04, 2008 08:22AM

Re: 487 not to run again?

mesaman3000 May 06, 2008 08:07PM

Re: 487 WILL run again!!

Tad June 03, 2008 02:30PM

Re: 487 WILL run again!!

round_house June 04, 2008 06:32PM

Re: 487 WILL run again!!

Rich Muth June 04, 2008 06:51PM

2000

John West June 04, 2008 07:28PM

Re: 2000

Chris Webster June 04, 2008 07:37PM

Re: 487 WILL run again!!

Jack Campbell June 05, 2008 09:07PM

Re: 487 WILL run again!!

John Bush June 05, 2008 10:31PM

487 makes 3

Roger Hogan June 04, 2008 10:11PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login