Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

One more point to add

August 03, 2006 10:24AM
I think it is quite easy for a railroad to run historically correct equipment and still maintain their current railroad business name. This is why I think C&TS would not be harmed by doing this with the locomotives and a few other structures.
I wanted to make the point for this that others must feel the same way I do. Look at Georgetown.
They are running C&S #9, but its still the Georgetown Loop Railroad isn't it???????
Maybe the C&TS should consider the same approach I have been suggesting, since Georgetown has now taken the lead on this concept, and I applaud them mightily from 1400 miles away!
Greg Scholl
Subject Author Posted

Number 9 in the late 30's *LINK*

William Reed July 31, 2006 01:01PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 01:28PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 01:58PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 02:10PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's *LINK*

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 02:18PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Richard "Bo" Boulware July 31, 2006 03:05PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 05:05PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 03:53PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 05:14PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Derrell Poole July 31, 2006 06:11PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

William Reed July 31, 2006 05:12PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Mike Trent July 31, 2006 05:20PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Greg Scholl August 01, 2006 03:03PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

William Reed August 01, 2006 08:01PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Greg Scholl August 02, 2006 06:54AM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

William Reed August 02, 2006 03:25PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Ed Stabler August 02, 2006 03:54PM

Doghouse Removal on the "Silverton"

Mike Trent August 02, 2006 04:17PM

Re: Number 9 in the late 30's

Greg Scholl August 03, 2006 10:20AM

One more point to add

Greg Scholl August 03, 2006 10:24AM

Re: Number 9 a month later *PIC*

Ken Martin July 31, 2006 08:04PM

Re: Number 9 a month later

stuart olson August 01, 2006 12:52AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.