Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: FEC 148

July 06, 2006 06:03PM
I would also rather see American Steam restored given all things being equal, like the locomotives and the cost. However, if I were running a run of the mill tourist operation and just wanted a steam engine, and the price was cheaper for a new engine from China versus another American Engine that was smaller I would go with the engine from China. In the case of the 148 it nor the China engine would be authentic to the area so it doesn't much matter in that instance.
I would like to see more US engines running that are available to do so, before seeing a Chinese engine run in the U.S. I think we are talking two different things here though...(1)Tourist lines are more apt to use the Chinese engine or the 148 type engine, (2)Mainline engines in the U.S. are available to run NOW, but given the insurance and other mainline issues are pretty much stuck, so the type of engine becomes a mute point. NKP 2-8-4 # 765 being a good example of an engine all dressed-up and no place to run!
Greg
Subject Author Posted

IHS 215

Ted Miles June 13, 2006 03:37PM

Monte Vista collection

Dennis June 13, 2006 04:41PM

Re: Monte Vista collection

Howard June 13, 2006 11:33PM

Re: IHS 215 *PIC*

Dave Dye June 15, 2006 07:12PM

Correction, that should have been June 05 *NM*

Dave Dye June 15, 2006 07:17PM

Caboose 0518 is there too *NM* *PIC*

Dave Dye June 15, 2006 07:13PM

Re: Caboose 0518 is there too

t bone July 06, 2006 03:45PM

FEC 148 *PIC*

Dave Dye June 15, 2006 07:29PM

Re: FEC 148

Kevin Bush June 16, 2006 05:14PM

Re: FEC 148

creeker June 16, 2006 06:23PM

Re: FEC 148

frank martindell June 18, 2006 01:10PM

Re: FEC 148

Douglas vV June 18, 2006 04:01PM

Re: FEC 148 *LINK*

Andrew Durden July 06, 2006 09:11AM

Re: FEC 148

G. W. Laepple July 06, 2006 10:04AM

Re: FEC 148

Andrew Durden July 06, 2006 11:49AM

Re: FEC 148

Earl July 06, 2006 01:16PM

Re: FEC 148

Andrew Durden July 06, 2006 02:00PM

Re: FEC 148

Jim Templin July 06, 2006 03:21PM

Re: FEC 148

Raymond Montgomery July 06, 2006 04:26PM

Re: FEC 148

Andrew Durden July 06, 2006 04:32PM

Re: FEC 148

Greg Scholl July 06, 2006 05:43PM

Re: FEC 148

Andrew Durden July 06, 2006 05:56PM

Re: FEC 148

Greg Scholl July 06, 2006 06:03PM

Re: FEC 148

Douglas vV July 06, 2006 07:29PM

Re: FEC 148

Kevin July 06, 2006 06:32PM

Re: FEC 148 and new boilers

JD Johnson July 07, 2006 09:51AM

Re: FEC 148

Kelly Anderson July 06, 2006 06:46PM

Re: FEC 148

Fred July 06, 2006 08:09PM

Re: FEC 148

Steve Zuiderveen July 07, 2006 09:02AM

Re: FEC 148

Stephen Syfrett July 08, 2006 09:27AM

Re: FEC 148

Kelly Anderson July 06, 2006 06:44PM

Re: FEC 148

Roger Mitchell July 07, 2006 11:12AM

Re: FEC 148

Donald Foster July 07, 2006 03:37PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.