Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: (Loop Content) LPCC Meeting Notes - 2/22/06

February 26, 2006 06:55AM
Jim,
Maybe not but ol' Lee Behrens seemed pretty peeved by the "negative publicity" in the articles! Why not just acknowledge that, "...the reality of the situation is that one steam engine with six cars is not going to be able to match the capacity of three engines of nine cars each! We had hoped to have the #9 ready for service last July but, in hindsight, that wasn't a realistic goal. We expect the #9 to be ready for service this season and will be concentrating on getting the #111 restored before the #30. Railstar has done an exceptional first year of operation and we expect, with the addition of a second steamer (and another diesel) to be able to do increase rider capacity substantially this season...." or words to that effect. Trying to say that GTL Inc. was "effective in getting the word out that the trains won't run on the Loop ever again" (or some such words to that effect) and blaming them for any shortfalls seems rather spiteful not to mention shortsighted and non-productive.
Subject Author Posted

(Loop Content) LPCC Meeting Notes - 2/22/06 *LINK*

Jim Poston February 25, 2006 08:29AM

Re: (Loop Content) LPCC Meeting Notes - 2/22/06

Steve Stockham February 25, 2006 10:24AM

Re: (Loop Content) LPCC Meeting Notes - 2/22/06

Douglas vV February 25, 2006 11:25AM

Re: (Loop Content) LPCC Meeting Notes - 2/22/06

Jim Poston February 25, 2006 12:17PM

Re: (Loop Content) LPCC Meeting Notes - 2/22/06

Steve Stockham February 26, 2006 06:55AM

Re: (Loop Content) LPCC Meeting Notes - 2/22/06

Michael Allen February 27, 2006 12:13PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.