Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Big Boy #4018

December 07, 2000 10:21AM
Brien, et. at,
Since I was on the original 3985 restoration team and the UP Steam Crew, may I take a stab at answering this?
First, the oil bunker for the 3985 came from the 3977 in Cody Park in North Platte, Nebraska.
(1) The two places where a 4000 can be turned are Cheyenne and Speer (not Laramie). They are 9 miles apart. Spend millions to restore a 4000 for an 18 mile round trip? not very likely. Laramie's wye is too tight and the turntable is gone. The 844 will derail on the Laramie Wye. The turntables are also gone in Rawlins and Green River.
(2) The 4000's were constructed originally for service from Ogden to Evanston, up the Wahsatch. the design worked out so well that their range was extended from Ogden to Cheyenne. To accomidate the 4000's, 120 ft. turntables were installed at all of the major terminals along the main line between Cheyenne and Ogden, but no further, Roundhouse stalls were extended, also. Fortunately, switches didn't need to be lengthened as theis had all ready been done to accomidate the 9000's (4-12-2's). On the 4000's occasional trips to Denver, they needed to put extension rails on the turntables and there were a myriad of other problems beside turning them. they are really no harder on track and bridges than anything else, BUT, the bridges have to be strong enough to carry them.
(3)Never having run one, I don't know anything about any tracking problems. I doubt that they would be much fussier than the 4-6-6-4. The big problem is those huge 25,0000 gallon tenders and their long frames.
(4) The 4-8-8-4 is not just an extended 4-6-6-4 but a completely different locomotive. The fireboxes are big (enormous), big enough that you could set up a table and chairs and have you and 6 of your closest friends to dinner inside one. The oil experiment produced hot spots in the firebox. The UP even tried dual burners but that went through the oil at twice the normal rate.
(5) The logistics of operating a coal burner were not as tough as finding the right size and grade of coal (screened lump) for stoker operation. There was also a small problem with fires and lawsuits. Shortly before the conversion to oil, the 3985 was restricted to Sherman Hill and Sherman Hill Only. The oil conversion made it possible to travel all over the system. Remember, the 4-6-6-4's were designed for system-wide use, not for a Special Service like the 4-8-8-4's.
(6) Yes, the 4000's were used for Passenger Service (especially during WWI). They were quite capable of developing speeds up to 70 mph. But why try to duplicate what the 3985 can all ready do in this day and age?
(7) Yes, the Steam and Heritage Fleet serve the UP's needs well. Besides, ask yourself why would the Railroad shell out a bunch of money to restore a 4000? They got the 3985 basically for nothing. All the labor was volunteer and the locomotive was in excellent shape when we pulled it from the Parking Lot.
The Steam Program by its very nature is always just hanging on by a thread (first to be cut as "Unnecessary"). I'd say that it's a credit to the UP that it even exists.
And last but not least, as I used to tell people who complained about no 4000 running... Why don't you go and enjoy the Steam Program on the ATSF, BN, NS, CSX, or SP?
Rick Steele
Subject Author Posted

Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 04, 2000 03:21PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

ncng9 December 04, 2000 03:28PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Stevo del Applegato December 04, 2000 07:19PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 04, 2000 08:17PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Brian Fritz December 04, 2000 09:03PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Stevo del Applegato December 04, 2000 09:47PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 04, 2000 10:33PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Mikky December 05, 2000 08:36AM

Don't sugar-coat it,Mikky..

El Coke December 05, 2000 10:55PM

Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Greg Scholl December 06, 2000 07:23AM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Fred T December 06, 2000 09:15AM

3751 image

Greg Scholl December 06, 2000 09:28AM

Re: 3751 image/Kansas sounds

ArtG December 06, 2000 12:12PM

3751 whistling

Greg Scholl December 06, 2000 12:57PM

Re: 3751 image *PIC*

Fred T December 07, 2000 08:36PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Taylor Rush December 08, 2000 08:12AM

I miss steam

pmcassell December 08, 2000 12:24PM

Re: I miss steam too

Fred T December 08, 2000 01:47PM

Re: I miss steam

Will Gleckler December 09, 2000 08:06AM

Re: I miss steam

Taylor Rush December 11, 2000 08:08AM

#700 Ten years ago

Greg Scholl December 11, 2000 12:31PM

Re: I miss steam

Will Gleckler December 11, 2000 10:51PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Steve Carlson December 12, 2000 12:40AM

4449 Story

Kevin Cook December 12, 2000 09:12AM

Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 13, 2000 04:18PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Taylor Rush December 13, 2000 07:32PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Oil Czar(Jerry Huck SVRy) December 13, 2000 07:48PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Jim Burrill December 13, 2000 09:08PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 13, 2000 09:58PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Taylor Rush December 13, 2000 10:21PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 14, 2000 06:49AM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Steve Carlson December 14, 2000 01:06AM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 14, 2000 07:11AM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

RBrinton December 14, 2000 09:33AM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Earl Pitts December 13, 2000 04:58PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Taylor Rush December 13, 2000 07:25PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Earl Pitts December 15, 2000 12:15AM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Mikky December 15, 2000 10:57AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

ted miles December 06, 2000 09:41AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Rick Steele December 07, 2000 10:21AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Greg Scholl December 07, 2000 01:12PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Ryan Scott December 05, 2000 07:46PM

Okay, I'll bite

James R. Temple December 05, 2000 08:39PM

Big Boys etc

Ted Miles December 06, 2000 09:53AM

Re: Big Boys etc

James R. Temple December 06, 2000 10:50AM

Re: Big Boys etc

pmcassell December 06, 2000 12:03PM

Re: Big Boys etc

Smitty December 06, 2000 05:24PM

Re: Big Boys etc

pmcassell December 06, 2000 08:54PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Earl Pitts December 06, 2000 04:15PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 06, 2000 04:54PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Earl Pitts December 06, 2000 09:50PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Curtis F. December 08, 2000 12:59PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 08, 2000 03:39PM

Damn Straight he would've

Grant Houston December 09, 2000 09:07PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Earl Pitts December 10, 2000 08:29PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Curtis F. December 10, 2000 10:06PM

On to Edaville

James R. Temple December 10, 2000 11:55PM

Re: On to Edaville

Boomer December 11, 2000 09:42AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Jim Adams December 13, 2000 10:18PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.