Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Big Boy #4018

December 04, 2000 09:03PM
> P.S. Come to think of it, is a Big Boy all that different to run from Challenger #3985? (besides coal firing)
The 3985 was a coal burner when it was originally restored to service. I forget where it got it's oil bunker, but it was from another UP park locomotive that used the same tender.
Steve Lee has covered the issues of why the U.P. is HIGHLY unlikely to ever consider restoring a Big Boy in several interviews and posts to news groups.
As I recall them in no particular order...
1) The two extant places in the UP system where they can be turned are only a few miles apart. I believe that is Cheyenne and Laramie.
2) They are hard on track and bridges. They are also very big and would have problems with clearances across the UP system.
3) They are hard to keep on track (he has explicitly explained that they are not two FEF 4-8-4's bolted end-to-end under one boiler). They're quite stiff and will walk off of soft track without much coaxing.
4) It would be extremely painful to convert them to oil. UP experimented with oil on the 4005(?) (in Denver at the Forney) but didn't pursue it. The locomotive was reverted to coal. The firebox is big... really big.
5) The UP's post restoration experience with 3985 as a coal burner convinced them they would never operate a coal burner again. The logistics, and expense, of positioning a hopper car full of coal and a clamshell crane (operated by a RR employee) was not trivial.
6) While there are reports of the Big Boys operating at speeds up to 70mph, they were designed to develop their maximum power at about 30mph. They're big freight locomotives, while the 8444 and 3985 are faster, dual service locomotives and can easily operate at the fastest allowable track speeds across the UP system.
7) Their current fleet of steam locomotives and heritage diesels is sufficient for their needs.
I'm pretty sure I've got his complete discussion (nearly a diatribe) that he posted in response to a usenet post. In that post, a troll suggested that the UP's reluctance to restore a Big Boy was Steve Lee's personal vendetta against them. Steve's response was very educational and interesting.
Subject Author Posted

Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 04, 2000 03:21PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

ncng9 December 04, 2000 03:28PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Stevo del Applegato December 04, 2000 07:19PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 04, 2000 08:17PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Brian Fritz December 04, 2000 09:03PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Stevo del Applegato December 04, 2000 09:47PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 04, 2000 10:33PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Mikky December 05, 2000 08:36AM

Don't sugar-coat it,Mikky..

El Coke December 05, 2000 10:55PM

Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Greg Scholl December 06, 2000 07:23AM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Fred T December 06, 2000 09:15AM

3751 image

Greg Scholl December 06, 2000 09:28AM

Re: 3751 image/Kansas sounds

ArtG December 06, 2000 12:12PM

3751 whistling

Greg Scholl December 06, 2000 12:57PM

Re: 3751 image *PIC*

Fred T December 07, 2000 08:36PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Taylor Rush December 08, 2000 08:12AM

I miss steam

pmcassell December 08, 2000 12:24PM

Re: I miss steam too

Fred T December 08, 2000 01:47PM

Re: I miss steam

Will Gleckler December 09, 2000 08:06AM

Re: I miss steam

Taylor Rush December 11, 2000 08:08AM

#700 Ten years ago

Greg Scholl December 11, 2000 12:31PM

Re: I miss steam

Will Gleckler December 11, 2000 10:51PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Steve Carlson December 12, 2000 12:40AM

4449 Story

Kevin Cook December 12, 2000 09:12AM

Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 13, 2000 04:18PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Taylor Rush December 13, 2000 07:32PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Oil Czar(Jerry Huck SVRy) December 13, 2000 07:48PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Jim Burrill December 13, 2000 09:08PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 13, 2000 09:58PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Taylor Rush December 13, 2000 10:21PM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 14, 2000 06:49AM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Steve Carlson December 14, 2000 01:06AM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

Rick Steele December 14, 2000 07:11AM

Re: Hold on there, Taylor

RBrinton December 14, 2000 09:33AM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Earl Pitts December 13, 2000 04:58PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Taylor Rush December 13, 2000 07:25PM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Earl Pitts December 15, 2000 12:15AM

Re: Sante Fe 3751 leaving Abo

Mikky December 15, 2000 10:57AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

ted miles December 06, 2000 09:41AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Rick Steele December 07, 2000 10:21AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Greg Scholl December 07, 2000 01:12PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Ryan Scott December 05, 2000 07:46PM

Okay, I'll bite

James R. Temple December 05, 2000 08:39PM

Big Boys etc

Ted Miles December 06, 2000 09:53AM

Re: Big Boys etc

James R. Temple December 06, 2000 10:50AM

Re: Big Boys etc

pmcassell December 06, 2000 12:03PM

Re: Big Boys etc

Smitty December 06, 2000 05:24PM

Re: Big Boys etc

pmcassell December 06, 2000 08:54PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Earl Pitts December 06, 2000 04:15PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 06, 2000 04:54PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Earl Pitts December 06, 2000 09:50PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Curtis F. December 08, 2000 12:59PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

James R. Temple December 08, 2000 03:39PM

Damn Straight he would've

Grant Houston December 09, 2000 09:07PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Earl Pitts December 10, 2000 08:29PM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Curtis F. December 10, 2000 10:06PM

On to Edaville

James R. Temple December 10, 2000 11:55PM

Re: On to Edaville

Boomer December 11, 2000 09:42AM

Re: Big Boy #4018

Jim Adams December 13, 2000 10:18PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.