Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Actually, Mike...

December 10, 2005 09:27AM
When I was at the White Pass I looked into this matter a little. The WP&YR had light rail and the K-28s were heavier than most of the other White Pass power. The primary problem was that ice build up beside the rails is and was a major problem. The large counter weights and long stroke relative to driver diameter caused them to derail frequently. The steep side of White Pass is not a place you want to be derailed. By the way being derailed along the shores of Lake Bennett would be no picnic either. The White Pass avoided using #69 and its sisters in the winter on the US side of the pass. When they ordered the 70 class mikes they bought inside frame engines.
Subject Author Posted

Working on the three K-28s

El Coke December 09, 2005 08:41AM

Re: Working on the three K-28s

Philip H. Walters December 09, 2005 09:36AM

Re: Working on the three K-28s

Erik W December 09, 2005 10:30AM

476

Bob December 09, 2005 01:15PM

Re: 476

Herb Kelsey December 09, 2005 01:31PM

Re: 476

Kevin Cook December 09, 2005 02:31PM

Re: 476

Josh McNeal December 09, 2005 10:27PM

Re: Working on the three K-28s

Herb Kelsey December 09, 2005 01:25PM

Thank you!!!

Jason Arnot December 09, 2005 04:16PM

Re: Working on the three K-28s

WP&Ymike December 10, 2005 01:09AM

Actually, Mike...

El Coke December 10, 2005 08:51AM

Re: Actually, Mike...

John Bush December 10, 2005 09:27AM

770th mechanics

Casey Carlson December 10, 2005 06:23PM

Re: Actually

WP&Ymike December 10, 2005 06:54PM

Good stuff,Mike !

El Coke December 10, 2005 07:41PM

Re: K-28s derailed?

WP&Ymike December 10, 2005 08:40PM

Re: Working on the three K-28s

earl December 13, 2005 11:30AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.