Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Cumbres, November 24, 1931

John Craft
November 25, 2005 12:19PM
Dick is correct. In timetable and train order operation, a train more than 12 hours late loses its authority to operate. So "no. 116" would have to be given orders as an extra to proceed.
My question would be, did this train actually operate as no. 116 between Chama and Cumbres? That would imply that it had left Chama less than 12 hours late, and been stuck on the hill for a couple of days. Or did it actually depart Chama as Extra 464-475 East, and the operator just marked it as no. 116 out of habit?
Or was it some combination - perhaps no. 116 had departed Chama, then returned to wait while the line was cleared?
JAC
Subject Author Posted

Cumbres, November 24, 1931

Jim McKee November 24, 2005 11:05AM

Re: Cumbres, November 24, 1931

Greg Raven November 24, 2005 03:10PM

Re: Cumbres, November 24, 1931

Jim McKee November 25, 2005 09:32AM

Re: Cumbres, November 24, 1931

John Craft November 25, 2005 12:19PM

Re: Cumbres, November 24, 1931

Jim McKee November 25, 2005 05:05PM

Re: Cumbres, November 24, 1931

Greg Raven November 25, 2005 06:48PM

Re: Cumbres, November 24, 1931

tom casper November 26, 2005 06:04AM

Train was stalled on the hill.

Casey Carlson November 28, 2005 08:18AM

Re: Train was stalled on the hill.

johnwilke November 28, 2005 11:12PM

Re: Train was stalled on the hill.

Douglas vV November 28, 2005 11:14PM

1931

Dick Seelye November 24, 2005 11:23PM

479 Appears Again.....

Mike Trent November 26, 2005 07:35AM

Re: 479 Appears Again.....

William Reed November 26, 2005 09:12PM

Re: 479 Appears Again.....

Mike Trent November 26, 2005 09:22PM

Re: 479 Appears Again.....

Jim McKee November 27, 2005 03:52PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.