Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

November 17, 2005 02:14AM
Well, usually a functioning railroad doesn't save a lot of old equipment. Even scrap value brings more revenue than keeping unused equipment and continually paying property taxes on it. So it seems odd that your RR would have retained a lot of non-productive steam locomotives just for old times' sake. I could see having a handful of pieces remaining from the final operating fleet but not most of the historical roster.
Subject Author Posted

Sumpter Valley 2-6-6-2 questions

creeker November 14, 2005 04:11PM

Re: Sumpter Valley 2-6-6-2 questions *LINK*

Bill Pratt November 14, 2005 08:00PM

Re: Sumpter Valley 2-6-6-2 questions

Erik W November 15, 2005 08:17AM

Re: Sumpter Valley 2-6-6-2 questions

Roger Mitchell November 15, 2005 12:44PM

Not to change the subject but...

Don Richter November 15, 2005 09:30AM

Re: Not to change the subject but...

Bill Pratt November 15, 2005 01:40PM

ET&S RR Co.?

Pat November 15, 2005 07:13AM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

creeker November 15, 2005 12:44PM

ET&S RR Co. roster

creeker November 15, 2005 12:49PM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

Steve Singer November 15, 2005 03:26PM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

creeker November 15, 2005 05:13PM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

George Gaskill November 16, 2005 11:57AM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

creeker November 16, 2005 04:24PM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

George Gaskill November 17, 2005 02:14AM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

creeker November 17, 2005 07:44AM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

Yosemite Sam November 15, 2005 12:47PM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

Tanque November 15, 2005 08:41PM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

creeker November 16, 2005 05:39PM

Re: ET&S RR Co.?

J.B.Bane November 16, 2005 07:49PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.