Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: SVRy logging

November 04, 2005 09:53AM
Taylor, I agree that is probably one or the other. I looked at the photos last night in R.S.&P, but now can't remember which was which. One engine is slightly larger, one being a 35 ton and the other a 40 ton. One of them has a distintive handrail along the sides of the boiler and comming down the front on the smokebox. It kept this railing even on the deadline waiting to be scrapped, the other engine did not have this. Also the smaller of the 2 has the steam line from the dome kinda exposed above the upper walkway on the boiler, while on the larger one the line drops below the catwalk. If you have R.S.&P handy you may be able to figure which is which. Also of note is that 5 was originally built as #3 for Stoddard.
Subject Author Posted

SVRy logging *PIC*

Steve Thompson November 02, 2005 10:06AM

Re: SVRy logging

J.B.Bane November 02, 2005 10:38AM

Re: SVRy logging

Steve Thompson November 02, 2005 11:25AM

Re: SVRy logging *PIC*

Steve Thompson November 05, 2005 01:27PM

Re: SVRy logging

J.B.Bane November 05, 2005 06:28PM

Re: SVRy logging

Steve Thompson November 05, 2005 07:26PM

Re: SVRy logging

SVCartoad November 02, 2005 11:34AM

Re: SVRy logging *PIC*

Steve Thompson November 02, 2005 12:14PM

Re: SVRy logging

J.B.Bane November 02, 2005 01:37PM

Re: SVRy logging

Taylor Rush November 04, 2005 02:10AM

Re: SVRy logging *PIC*

Steve Thompson November 04, 2005 05:39AM

Re: SVRy logging

J.B.Bane November 04, 2005 09:53AM

Re: SVRy logging

dan November 04, 2005 07:46AM

Re: SVRy logging

Tallow Pot - Jeff Chittick November 04, 2005 08:19AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.