Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: What is this TABOR thing anyway?

October 31, 2005 12:17PM
Don, again an excellent summary, complete with attendant scary-for-C&TS conclusions. I hope you don’t mind if I add something, however. I’ll keep this as politically neutral as possible. I DON'T want to discuss the merits of any of the below-mentioned spending ammendments, I just want to present additional information.
You’ve done a good job of explaining the “ratchet effect”, which is indeed the “glitch in TABOR” that those of us subjected to endless C&D ads hear about constantly. However, the budget woes are compounded by another amendment, and to fully understand the squeeze created by this second amendment, you have to know about yet a third one which is a bit older.
Amendment 23 mandates yearly increases in K-12 spending. The funding model for this is a bit complex, but the net result is that in down years, general fund moneys are increasingly relied on to fund the mandated increases. A reserve fund (the State Education Fund) exists to help buffer things, but that fund is predicted to become insolvent as early as this year (if it hasn’t already – I don’t have recent numbers). This decreases the amount of general fund moneys available for everything else, and will get worse if/when the SEF goes broke.
The third amendment I mentioned, the Gallagher Amendment, relates to personal property taxes and has driven down the amount of property tax revenue collected. Property taxes are the local source of funding for schools, thus with reduced property tax revenues, more funding must come from the state. In the two decades Gallagher has been in place, the state’s share has increased from ~40% to ~60%. And so the problem grows.
BTW, since Dick Cowles comments, I’ve been trying to research TABOR exceptions. So far, the only one I’ve discovered which allows some funding out of TABOR excesses is the aforementioned State Education Fund, and that only by constitutional amendment. 23 came after TABOR.
I know this stuff is pretty far a-field from Narrow Gauge, but it’s central to any discussion of C&TS funding from Colorado.
Scott
Subject Author Posted

Colorado Funding for C&TS

Dick Cowles October 29, 2005 11:23AM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

danb October 29, 2005 12:45PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Don Richter October 29, 2005 01:38PM

???The Polls???

roger hogan October 29, 2005 01:43PM

Re: ???The Polls???

Don Richter October 29, 2005 03:37PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Scott Turner October 29, 2005 01:51PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Scott Turner October 29, 2005 12:54PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

danb October 29, 2005 02:13PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Dick Cowles October 29, 2005 04:47PM

Colorado: the dog ate our check book. *NM*

El Coke October 29, 2005 08:30PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Scott Turner October 30, 2005 12:08PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Dick Cowles October 31, 2005 08:24PM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Scott Turner November 01, 2005 07:54AM

Re: Colorado Funding for C&TS

Mac October 30, 2005 01:37PM

What is this TABOR thing anyway?

Don Richter October 30, 2005 03:59PM

Re: What is this TABOR thing anyway?

Chile John October 30, 2005 04:12PM

Re: What is this TABOR thing anyway?

Don Richter October 30, 2005 04:59PM

Re: What is this TABOR thing anyway?

Scott Turner October 31, 2005 12:17PM

Re: What is this TABOR thing anyway?

Don Richter October 31, 2005 01:44PM

Does the Bi-State TREATY set a miminum $ amount?

Russ Sperry November 01, 2005 12:41AM

Re: Does the Bi-State TREATY set a miminum $ amoun

Scott Turner November 01, 2005 08:13AM

So Bi-State TREATY does NOT set a miminum ...

Russ Sperry November 01, 2005 06:40PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.