Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Boilers

November 03, 2000 07:17PM
"It seems that in order to run the WW&F 9 the
museum will have to get a new boiler built.
How then was a "poorly designed boiler" run
over three or four railroads for over 40 years
without problems?"
The problem with #9's boiler is two-fold.
First, it is a "modified lap-seam", meaning that the areas they join lap over each other. A straight join is just a lap-seam. "Modified" means they stuck another plate in there that completely covers the lap seam, probably installed when Maine or Federal laws outlawed the lap-seam.
Today's boilers are butt-seam, meaning there's no overlap. Lap-seams are illegal now because moisture can rot out the metal in between the seams, especially where the boiler is riveted (which #9's is).
Secondly, ultrasound readings indicated substantially thin spots over a large part of the boiler. Now we knew darn well that the readings weren't as thin as the ultrasound said they were, because we phyisically measured it's thickness at one of the holes in the boiler. But there was some kind of layer in the middle of the metal that reflected the signal. We attribute it to irregularities in the casting in 1891, when it was built.
We had the choice of patching the old boiler or getting a new one. We decided on a new one so that the historical integrity of the old boiler could be preserved, and it could be put on display.
Boilers however, would be replaced during an engine's service life. Not often, but it did happen.
Subject Author Posted

Boilers

ted Miles November 03, 2000 10:00AM

Re: Boilers

Earl Knoob November 03, 2000 10:33AM

Re: Boilers

P. Kurilecz November 03, 2000 10:49AM

Re: Boilers

Earl Pitts November 03, 2000 04:16PM

Re: Boilers

James C Patten November 03, 2000 07:17PM

Re: Boilers

P.Kurilecz November 03, 2000 08:33PM

Re: Boilers

Earl Pitts November 03, 2000 09:43PM

Re: Boilers

P. Kurilecz November 04, 2000 08:33AM

Re: Boilers

pmcassell November 04, 2000 09:01AM

Re: Boilers

P. Kurilecz November 04, 2000 04:38PM

WW&F #9's boiler

James C Patten November 04, 2000 06:15PM

Thank you -- & Good Luck (NM) *NM*

P. Kurilecz November 04, 2000 09:27PM

Re: Boilers

Owen Chapman November 04, 2000 04:16PM

Re: Boilers

Ted Miles November 04, 2000 07:01PM

Re: Boilers

pmcassell November 05, 2000 08:20AM

Re: Boilers

rdmstr November 05, 2000 11:11PM

Re: Boilers

M Austin December 01, 2000 06:21AM

Re: Boilers

William L. Petitjean, P.E. December 01, 2000 10:06PM

Re: Boilers

Brian Norden December 01, 2000 11:27PM

Re: Boilers

Michael Allen December 02, 2000 09:28AM

Boilers+Steam Locomotives

pmcassell December 05, 2000 02:54PM

Re: Boilers

Earl Pitts December 07, 2000 05:13PM

Re: Boilers

Michael Allen December 08, 2000 11:46AM

Re: Boilers

Earl Pitts December 09, 2000 11:34PM

Re: Boilers

Michael Allen December 10, 2000 07:27PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.