Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Radio help...

Wade Hall
April 24, 2001 10:43AM
The short answer is yes. We looked at a potential site that would be line of sight into the Toltec Gorge area. Some options that could be coupled with this is moving the Cumbres repeater to the top of Cumbres Peak--that might help some but may not be cost-effective for what is gained. Also, we looked at siting a repeater on San Antonio Peak. There is a State of New Mexico site there (along with a lot of others) that has commercial power available. It would also provide some benefits, but the coverage from the Antonito depot antenna is actually pretty good on the east end of the line. The San Antonio site still does not solve the "Toltec" problem according to our research. Coupled with a repeater in the Toltec area, it could solve that problem, but that's two new repeaters and that, of course, costs money.
The railroad also needs to decide if they want sufficient coverage to use handheld radios for all communication, or if they would accept use of "mobile" radios on trains (which have them), motorcars, and trucks. The higher transmit wattage and much more efficient antennas on mobile units may be an effective way to improve coverage in some marginal areas where handhelds just don't "cut it" right now. Even mobiles won't solve the problem around Toltec, but that may be a spot where the railroad works around less than optimum coverage until the resources ($) are available. And yes, even the Class I railroads have that problem of "dead spots" in mountainous areas like ours. The UP fights one within a few miles of my house all the time.
Subject Author Posted

Cellular reception on the C&TS

El Coke April 22, 2001 10:39PM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

Wireless John April 22, 2001 11:51PM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

RichB April 23, 2001 05:02AM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

John Vandenberg April 23, 2001 05:23AM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

Brian Norden April 23, 2001 07:28PM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

Bill Kepner April 23, 2001 08:23AM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

Doug vV April 23, 2001 05:03PM

Cellular reception on the C&TS (1999) *PIC*

Roger Hogan April 23, 2001 05:00PM

Satellite cell

RichB April 23, 2001 07:12PM

Re: Satellite cell: Name of Carrier ?? *NM*

El Coke April 24, 2001 09:22AM

Re: Satellite cell: Name of Carrier ??

Fred T April 24, 2001 10:34AM

Name of Carrier

RichB April 24, 2001 10:53PM

Re: Name of Carrier

Slim April 26, 2001 10:24PM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

Rich Muth April 23, 2001 05:15PM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

rdmstr April 23, 2001 05:21PM

Re: Cellular vs. radio

Wade Hall April 23, 2001 08:18PM

Radio help...

RichB April 23, 2001 08:54PM

Re: Radio help...

Wade Hall April 24, 2001 10:43AM

Re: Radio help...

Gregory Raven April 24, 2001 12:28PM

Re: Radios .

Oil Czar(Jerry Huck SVRy) April 24, 2001 02:10PM

Re: Radios .

Gregory Raven April 24, 2001 03:17PM

Re: Radios .

Oil Czar(Jerry Huck SVRy) April 25, 2001 08:33AM

Re: Radios .

dan April 27, 2001 07:12PM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

Gregory Raven April 24, 2001 05:27AM

Re: Cellular reception on the C&TS

Boris Serena April 23, 2001 10:00PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.