Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

November 17, 2021 03:44PM avatar
I have no information on the thinking behind the numbering. The old steam engines were all numbered below #100, The two mechanical switch engines #100 and #101 were 100's, so maybe something this unique and large deserved a bigger number. While we are playing with the numbers we could ask why #50 was given that number instead of following the past practice of sequential numbering? Had that been followed, it would have likely been #19. The next number question is why did mikados number #19 and #20 come from Alco numbered #102 and #101 respectively which were changed soon after delivery? They are also backwards in the order of assembly #20 being one builders number digit below #19. And then why did they number the switch engines #100 and #101 instead of following the sequential pattern, which would have made them #21 and #22? Following the sequential scheme, #250 and #251 would have been #23 and #24!
Subject Author Posted

Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition Attachments

J.B.Bane November 16, 2021 02:18PM

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

davidtltc November 16, 2021 06:13PM

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

J.B.Bane November 16, 2021 07:58PM

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

davidtltc November 17, 2021 02:41PM

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

J.B.Bane November 17, 2021 03:44PM

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

Ethan November 22, 2021 09:04PM

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

John K November 16, 2021 08:03PM

Re: Uintah #50 to SVRy #250 in Transition

Earl November 17, 2021 07:02PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login