Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

July 12, 2021 11:28AM
Casey Akin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting info, am I correct in seeing the end
> walls were reinforced with vertical rails?

Yes, as for the RPO's still in service as such by the mid to late 1920's, at the request of/to meet the requirements of the Post Office which was in general not happy with wood cars by this time. (CM had built 3 new steel RPO's in 1913 for the same reason). Rails were, IIRC, sections of worn out 65#.

> Do RPO cars still exist on normal trains like
> Amtrak and the like??

nedsn3 gave most of the answer to this, the last RPO's in service were on the NE Corridor on a late-night train and were removed ca 1975 or '76. Trains mag covered the event.

Given reason for cancelling most RPO's in '67-'68 was that they didn't fit in with ZIP Code system. It has been alleged this was a payoff to airlines for campaign support involved.

The profitability of mail/express service in general is debatable, and has been debated at length over the years. The Trains issue "Who Shot the Passenger Train" claimed that it was a loser since RR's had to supply personal and facilities and could not, unlike airlines, refuse to carry the mail that day if they had a better money maker to haul. (Airlines also got a better deal on several other term and a higher rate of pay per pound carried)

Amtrak did take a stab at mail(sealed bag) & express service in the mid to late 1990's. It pissed off the "host" railroads who viewed it as an infringement on their own traffic. For the most part it was not a very well organized effort and flopped. Again, lots of controversy.

Hank



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/12/2021 11:33AM by hank.
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Paul Ferguson July 11, 2021 07:11PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Jeff Taylor July 11, 2021 08:08PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

bcp July 11, 2021 08:46PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

bcp July 11, 2021 08:50PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Casey Akin July 11, 2021 09:14PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Brian Norden July 11, 2021 09:27PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Earl July 12, 2021 12:22AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Casey Akin July 12, 2021 12:49AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

nedsn3 July 12, 2021 06:37AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Brian Norden July 12, 2021 11:18AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

hank July 12, 2021 11:28AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 60

davidtltc July 12, 2021 06:14AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 60 Attachments

Rob483 July 12, 2021 09:29AM

Thank You Rob

davidtltc July 12, 2021 09:58AM

Re: Thank You Rob

Bill Scobie July 12, 2021 11:02AM

Re: Thank You Rob

TonyK375 July 12, 2021 12:06PM

Re: Thank You Rob

Jeff Taylor July 12, 2021 03:24PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63 Attachments

Paul Ferguson July 12, 2021 04:57PM

Nice Historic Photo

davidtltc July 12, 2021 05:30PM

Re: Nice Historic Photo

Jeff Taylor July 12, 2021 09:53PM

Re: Nice Historic Photo

davidtltc July 12, 2021 10:22PM

Re: Nice Historic Photo

nedsn3 July 13, 2021 07:11AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63 Attachments

Jerry474 July 13, 2021 08:46AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Craig Kumler July 14, 2021 02:14PM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Vetapass July 13, 2021 11:29AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63 Attachments

Vetapass July 13, 2021 11:39AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63 Attachments

Joe Weigman July 14, 2021 11:14AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Bill Scobie July 14, 2021 11:26AM

Re: D&RGW RPO Nos. 62 & 63

Joe Weigman July 14, 2021 11:49AM

Long and short RPO's?? Attachments

Wayne Hoskin December 08, 2022 05:31AM

Re: Long and short RPO's??

Dave_A December 08, 2022 01:57PM

Re: Long and short RPO's??

bcp December 08, 2022 02:03PM

Re: Long and short RPO's??

Wayne Hoskin January 30, 2023 01:08AM

Re: D&RGW RPO No. ?? Attachments

Russo Loco December 08, 2022 12:30PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login