Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Farmington turn

April 14, 2004 07:53AM
Right you are Cokerman...
The Farmington run involved lots of "spot time" while cars were unloaded, switched, etc. That resulted in lots of overtime, something that all railroaders live for. Old heads tell me if the NG had to deal with the current 12-hour law, it wouldn't have worked at all.
Jim Pearce told me of the long shove move into Farmington. I don't recall the details, but I think it involved a facing point move into Farmington, picking up the empties inbound, shoving them ahead to town, then spotting the loads headed back to Durango.
He did say Farmington water was foul. Dispite loading the tender with water treatment "Nalco Balls", the boilers foamed. He said he rarely got out of Farmington with out taking some water. He would tank up in Bondad headed south, switch Farmington, then take only enough water to get back to Bondad. Sometimes they missed thier guess and had to drop thier train north of Cedar Hill and run for water. He told of a winter time trip with a 470 (common winter-time power to Farmington because the roadbed got real soft). They were headed home with a big train. He had a green fireman who managed to to slug the engine with too much coal. They were dragging about 60 cars. They had to stop near Flora Vista to blow up steam, shake the fire down, and get the water up in the boiler. He got to about 4 miles from the tank when the injecter sucked the tender dry. As he was beating the engine hard, he had no choice but to stop, cut off and run for water.
I guess running for water was a more forgivable sin than dropping the fire. At least it wasn't as hard on the engine.
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW Operations

Andy Roth April 08, 2004 09:26PM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Steve Singer April 09, 2004 05:50AM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Mike Stillwell April 09, 2004 07:53AM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Herb Kelsey April 09, 2004 09:21AM

Re: D&RGW Operations

El Skonk April 09, 2004 09:27AM

Re: D&RGW Operations

J. B. Bowers April 09, 2004 09:39AM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Gavin Hamilton April 09, 2004 10:37AM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Jim Armstrong April 09, 2004 12:31PM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Andy Roth April 09, 2004 12:52PM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Jim Armstrong April 09, 2004 01:00PM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Andy Roth April 09, 2004 01:16PM

Re: D&RGW Operations

earl April 12, 2004 08:03PM

Farmington turn

El Coke April 12, 2004 09:35PM

Re: Farmington turn

Andre Poniatowski April 13, 2004 05:13PM

Re: Farmington turn

earl April 14, 2004 07:53AM

V.B.W.

El Coke April 14, 2004 01:08PM

Re: Farmington turn

Les Clark April 15, 2004 04:39PM

Re: D&RGW Operations

John Templeton-Chama Station Agent April 13, 2004 08:47AM

Re: D&RGW Operations

Andy Roth April 19, 2004 12:14PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.