Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

automatic couplers and FRA on steam locomotives

February 17, 2004 10:17PM
The following FRA regulation is interesting. I hope you enjoy.
Robby
Sec. 231.17 Specifications common to all steam locomotives.
(a) Hand brakes. (1) Hand brakes will not be required on locomotives
nor on tenders when attached to locomotives.
(2) If tenders are detached from locomotives and used in special
service, they shall be equipped with efficient hand brakes.
(b) Running boards--(1) Number. Two.
[[Page 422]]
(2) Dimensions. Not less than 10 inches wide. If of wood, not less
than 11/2 inches in thickness; if of metal, not less than three-
sixteenths of an inch, properly supported.
(3) Location. One on each side of boiler extending from cab to front
end near pilot-beam. (Running boards may be in sections. Flat-top
steamchests may form section of running board.)
(4) Manner of application. (i) Running boards shall be securely
fastened with bolts, rivets, or studs.
(ii) Locomotives having Wootten type boilers with cab located on top
of boiler more than 12 inches forward from boiler head shall have
suitable running boards running from cab to rear of locomotive, with
handrailings not less than 20 nor more than 48 inches above outside edge
of running boards, securely fastened with bolts, rivets, or studs.
(c) Handrails--(1) Number. Two or more.
(2) Dimensions. Not less than 1 inch in diameter, wrought iron or
steel.
(3) Location. One on each side of boiler extending from near cab to
near front end of boiler, and extending across front end of boiler, not
less than 24 nor more than 66 inches above running board.
(4) Manner of application. Handrails shall be securely fastened to
boiler.
(d) Tenders of Vanderbilt type. (1) Tenders known as the Vanderbilt
type shall be equipped with running boards; one on each side of tender
not less than 10 inches in width and one on top of tender not less than
48 inches in width, extending from coal space to rear of tender.
(2) There shall be a handrail on each side of top running board,
extending from coal space to rear of tank, not less than 1 inch in
diameter and not less than 20 inches in height above running board from
coal space to manhole.
(3) There shall be a handrail extending from coal space to within 12
inches of rear of tank, attached to each side of tank above side running
board not less than 30 nor more than 66 inches above running board.
(4) There shall be one vertical end handhold on each side of
Vanderbilt type of tender, located within 8 inches of rear of tank
extending from within 8 inches of top of end sill to within 8 inches of
side handrail. Post supporting rear end of side running board, if not
more than 2 inches in diameter and properly located, may form section of
handhold.
(5) An additional horizontal end handhold shall be applied on rear
end of all Vanderbilt type of tenders which are not equipped with
vestibules. Handhold to be located not less than 30 nor more than 66
inches above top of end sill. Clear length of handhold to be not less
than 48 inches.
(6) Ladders shall be applied at forward ends of side running boards.
(e) Handrails and steps for headlights. (1) Locomotives having
headlights which can not be safely and conveniently reached from pilot-
beam or steam chests shall be equipped with secure handrails and steps
suitable for the use of men in getting to and from such headlights.
(2) A suitable metal end or side ladder shall be applied to all
tanks more than 48 inches in height, measured from the top of end sill,
and securely fastened with bolts or rivets.
(f) Couplers. Locomotives shall be equipped with automatic couplers
at rear of tender and front of locomotive.
Subject Author Posted

Coupler size list *PIC*

Bruce Pryor February 13, 2004 10:52PM

Re: Coupler size list

Smokebox February 14, 2004 02:29AM

Re: Coupler size list

Glenn Christensen February 14, 2004 08:38AM

Added-thanks *NM*

Bruce Pryor February 14, 2004 08:56AM

We still need info on....

Smokebox February 14, 2004 02:58PM

Re: We still need info on....

jbbane February 14, 2004 05:50PM

info on....KMR

WP&Ymike February 14, 2004 07:23PM

Re: We still need info on....

Glenn Christensen February 15, 2004 10:36AM

Just re-read Bruces list ...

Glenn Christensen February 15, 2004 10:39AM

Re: SPng and PCRy size confirmation

Brian Norden February 15, 2004 12:32PM

Re: SPng and PCRy size confirmation

jthirtysix February 16, 2004 08:09PM

Re: SPng and PCRy size confirmation

Brian Norden February 16, 2004 08:34PM

Re: SPng and PCRy size confirmation

Glenn Christensen February 16, 2004 09:05PM

Re: SPng and PCRy size confirmation

jthirtysix February 18, 2004 06:49AM

sizing the Uintah?

Rodger Polley February 14, 2004 08:57PM

Re: Here's another one *LINK*

Brian Norden February 15, 2004 08:46PM

Coupler list updated again *NM* *PIC*

Bruce Pryor February 15, 2004 09:25PM

Re: Coupler list updated again

Glenn Christensen February 15, 2004 10:02PM

Added *NM*

Bruce Pryor February 15, 2004 10:15PM

Re: Coupler list updated again *PIC*

El-VB February 15, 2004 10:18PM

Re: Coupler list updated again

Glenn Christensen February 16, 2004 11:57AM

More Revisions?

Jeff A. February 16, 2004 09:20AM

Conflicting information

Bruce Pryor February 16, 2004 10:22AM

Re: Conflicting information

Jeff A. February 16, 2004 11:09AM

And the winner is ... Link and Pin!

Glenn Christensen February 16, 2004 12:04PM

Re: And the winner is ... Link and Pin!

Jeff A. February 16, 2004 02:37PM

Re: And the winner is ... Link and Pin!

jbbane February 16, 2004 08:37PM

Re: And the winner is ... Link and Pin!

Skip Luke February 16, 2004 09:00PM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

Ted Miles February 17, 2004 10:52AM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

Skip Luke February 17, 2004 11:28AM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

jbbane February 17, 2004 01:43PM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

Skip Luke February 17, 2004 02:59PM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

dan February 17, 2004 07:45PM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

jbbane February 17, 2004 08:29PM

couplers

dan February 17, 2004 08:46PM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

Ted Miles February 18, 2004 12:06PM

Re: Miller Hook couplers *LINK*

Randy Hees February 20, 2004 10:54PM

Re: Miller Hook couplers

Brian Norden February 17, 2004 09:40PM

Re: And the winner is ... Link and Pin!

Glenn Christensen February 16, 2004 09:21PM

Re: And the winner is ... Link and Pin!

Rodger Polley February 16, 2004 08:59PM

Uintah-full size or 3/4?

Bruce Pryor February 16, 2004 10:51PM

Re: Uintah-full size or 3/4?

John Bush February 17, 2004 12:14PM

Re: Uintah-full size or 3/4?

Rodger Polley February 17, 2004 10:35PM

sorry, sorry, sorry......

Rodger Polley February 17, 2004 10:30PM

Re: Conflicting info, Safety Appliance Act

PRSL February 16, 2004 07:27PM

Re: before knuckle couplers

Brian Norden February 16, 2004 08:13PM

Re: Conflicting information

John Bush February 17, 2004 11:57AM

Re: current 3' industrial coupler

Brian Norden February 16, 2004 09:42AM

It Legal to link to Locomotive

PRSL February 16, 2004 12:16AM

Re: It Legal to link to Locomotive

SVCartoad February 16, 2004 12:23PM

Re: It Legal to link to Locomotive

jbbane February 16, 2004 01:39PM

What type code are the D&RGW full size coupler?

PRSL February 17, 2004 09:50AM

Re: What type code are the D&RGW full size coupler

Earl February 17, 2004 09:05PM

automatic couplers and FRA on steam locomotives

Robby Peartree February 17, 2004 10:17PM

Re: automatic couplers and FRA on steam locomotive

PRSL February 18, 2004 10:27AM

Re: Coupler size list

Douglas van Veelen February 17, 2004 03:30PM

Re: Coupler size list

Skip Luke February 17, 2004 06:22PM

I won't start that list. Someone else can. *NM*

Bruce Pryor February 17, 2004 07:06PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.