Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

March 11, 2020 08:59PM avatar
Earl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When the side sheets were cut out,
> it was discovered that in order to avoid replacing
> the outer wrapper sheet the SP had installed
> thimbles in the staybolt holes to reduce their
> size.

I understand from an old SP boilermaker that the proper term for those doughnut shaped parts was a**holes. So I guess #1744 always had a lot more a**holes on board than the two in the cab!
Subject Author Posted

NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

kcsivils March 10, 2020 06:31PM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

Jason Midyette March 10, 2020 06:55PM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

Earl March 10, 2020 08:23PM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

Jason Midyette March 11, 2020 07:49AM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

Everett Lueck March 11, 2020 08:16AM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly? (Current Photos) Attachments

justlegg March 11, 2020 10:50AM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly? (Current Photos)

Everett Lueck March 11, 2020 02:31PM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

Kelly Anderson March 11, 2020 08:59PM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

Will Gant March 11, 2020 09:56PM

Re: NNG-Why did 1744's stint in service end so abruptly?

et&wnc March 11, 2020 10:40PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login