Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: A Doubleheader of the Distant Past . . .

May 28, 2019 08:02PM avatar
Russo Loco Wrote:

>
>
> It was quite common for a smaller-drivered but
> often more powerful "freight" locomotive to help a
> "passenger" engine with less t.e. but potentially
> greater speed overcome a steep grade — see
> the first photo on
> [ngdiscussion.net]
> 73286 for a classic example.  Out west on the
> S.P. standard gauge line slow but powerful
> 2-10-2's with 63" drivers were the usual helper
> power coupled in front of the much faster
> 80"-drivered Daylight 4-8-4's for the climb up
> Cuesta Grade north of San Luis Obispo.


Thank you for your reply. 315 doubled with a k-38 on Saturday and they have different sized drivers. I will sure try to make it out when 315 and 168 do double head. Perhaps next year for the pre 1900 event in August.
Subject Author Posted

Doubleheader of the Future? Attachments

Dick Bell May 28, 2019 03:08PM

Re: Doubleheader of the Future?

John Bush May 28, 2019 03:11PM

Re: Doubleheader of the Future?

guymonmd May 28, 2019 03:37PM

Re: A Doubleheader of the Distant Past . . .

Russo Loco May 28, 2019 04:06PM

Re: A Doubleheader of the Distant Past . . .

guymonmd May 28, 2019 08:02PM

Re: Doubleheader of the Future?

pd3463 May 28, 2019 06:51PM

Re: Doubleheader of the Future? Attachments

Chris Walker May 28, 2019 07:25PM

Re: Doubleheader of the Future?

Will Gant May 28, 2019 08:10PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login