Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Re:#483 In Service

November 01, 2017 05:39AM
LOGGERHOGGER Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With all this talk of #483 as an non-operating
> hulk, I thought I would post a photo of her in
> service on a blast train.
>
> martin
> [attachment 43434 DRGW483.JK.small.jpg]

I presume you mean 'ballast' train Martin? Where was this location?

Wayne from Oz
Subject Author Posted

Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

kcsivils October 31, 2017 07:59AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

hank October 31, 2017 09:04AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Kelly Anderson October 31, 2017 09:06AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Greg Vigil October 31, 2017 05:22PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Clyde Putman October 31, 2017 07:02PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Johnson Barr October 31, 2017 07:22PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Russ489 October 31, 2017 07:11PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Earl November 01, 2017 12:35AM

Re:#483 In Service Attachments

LOGGERHOGGER November 01, 2017 04:40AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service Attachments

Chris Walker November 01, 2017 05:39AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Wayne Hoskin November 01, 2017 05:39AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Greg Scholl November 01, 2017 07:30AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

tomc November 01, 2017 09:52AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Ross Miller November 01, 2017 07:17PM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

tomc November 02, 2017 08:50AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service at Maysville

Chris Walker November 02, 2017 04:05PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Earl November 03, 2017 02:41PM

Monarch Branch Standard gauging

hank November 03, 2017 06:41PM

Re: Monarch Branch speculations, etc.

Russo Loco November 03, 2017 07:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login