Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

October 31, 2017 09:06AM avatar
As I understand it, boiler and running gear wear and tear, but nothing out of the ordinary was the reason. Rather than overhaul #483, other derelict K-36's were less expensive to return to operation. By the time that all of them were in service, in addition to the wear and tear that needs to be overhauled, forty years of cannibalism including some pretty expensive parts now employed on the others needs to be reversed to return her to operation.
Subject Author Posted

Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

kcsivils October 31, 2017 07:59AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

hank October 31, 2017 09:04AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Kelly Anderson October 31, 2017 09:06AM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Greg Vigil October 31, 2017 05:22PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Clyde Putman October 31, 2017 07:02PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Johnson Barr October 31, 2017 07:22PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Russ489 October 31, 2017 07:11PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Earl November 01, 2017 12:35AM

Re:#483 In Service Attachments

LOGGERHOGGER November 01, 2017 04:40AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service Attachments

Chris Walker November 01, 2017 05:39AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Wayne Hoskin November 01, 2017 05:39AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Greg Scholl November 01, 2017 07:30AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

tomc November 01, 2017 09:52AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

Ross Miller November 01, 2017 07:17PM

Re: Re:#483 In Service

tomc November 02, 2017 08:50AM

Re: Re:#483 In Service at Maysville

Chris Walker November 02, 2017 04:05PM

Re: Forced retirement of the 483 - why?

Earl November 03, 2017 02:41PM

Monarch Branch Standard gauging

hank November 03, 2017 06:41PM

Re: Monarch Branch speculations, etc.

Russo Loco November 03, 2017 07:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login