Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

wimpy?

June 16, 2017 09:36AM
Earl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm thinking that the engines that became class
> C-17, as well as the former F&CC engines, were
> built with lap seam steel boilers. As they were
> not outlawed by the 1911 boiler law, they kept
> running.
>
That's my understanding too.


>
> Once
> the big engines started coming in the 1920's they
> had little need for wimpy 145 lb boilered 2-8-0's.
>
I suspect it was the age of the boiler that ruled. C-17 & C-18 had the same tonnage rating, which was higher than C-19. (14 tons higher on the 4% grades) But the C-19's had 1912-13 era boilers vs 1887 on the C-17's so the C-17's went first.
hank
Subject Author Posted

Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913 Attachments

MD Ramsey June 14, 2017 10:25AM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

John K June 14, 2017 03:15PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Earl June 14, 2017 07:18PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Donald Foster June 14, 2017 07:34PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913 Attachments

J.B.Bane June 14, 2017 07:50PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

wishiwasincolorado June 14, 2017 10:10PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

nedsn3 June 14, 2017 09:53PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Floppo June 14, 2017 11:23PM

Class 56, 45 1/2 and the 1911 boiler law

hank June 15, 2017 09:52AM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

wishiwasincolorado June 15, 2017 04:48PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Earl June 15, 2017 01:25PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

J.B.Bane June 15, 2017 02:14PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Earl June 15, 2017 03:55PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

James June 16, 2017 01:36PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913 Attachments

J.B.Bane June 16, 2017 06:05PM

Re: Air Res. Attachments

Chris Walker June 16, 2017 07:09PM

wimpy?

hank June 16, 2017 09:36AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login