Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

June 15, 2017 01:25PM avatar
I'm thinking that the engines that became class C-17, as well as the former F&CC engines, were built with lap seam steel boilers. As they were not outlawed by the 1911 boiler law, they kept running. Looking at RGS 42 years ago in Durango, it appears to have been re-boilered with a butt-strap boiler. Without new boilers, the C-17's only had 145lb boiler pressure. A few of the C-18's were in the same boat. The ones that got upgraded to 160lb boilers may have had re-enforcing straps added to the lap seams. Once the big engines started coming in the 1920's they had little need for wimpy 145 lb boilered 2-8-0's.
Subject Author Posted

Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913 Attachments

MD Ramsey June 14, 2017 10:25AM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

John K June 14, 2017 03:15PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Earl June 14, 2017 07:18PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Donald Foster June 14, 2017 07:34PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913 Attachments

J.B.Bane June 14, 2017 07:50PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

wishiwasincolorado June 14, 2017 10:10PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

nedsn3 June 14, 2017 09:53PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Floppo June 14, 2017 11:23PM

Class 56, 45 1/2 and the 1911 boiler law

hank June 15, 2017 09:52AM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

wishiwasincolorado June 15, 2017 04:48PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Earl June 15, 2017 01:25PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

J.B.Bane June 15, 2017 02:14PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

Earl June 15, 2017 03:55PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913

James June 16, 2017 01:36PM

Re: Boiler Problems, RGS No. 1, 1913 Attachments

J.B.Bane June 16, 2017 06:05PM

Re: Air Res. Attachments

Chris Walker June 16, 2017 07:09PM

wimpy?

hank June 16, 2017 09:36AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login