Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Ballast question

May 11, 2017 06:50PM
Railroads used gravel and other material due to ease and availability. Cinders were also thrown in as a "free" ballast supply. As equipment and trains became heavier, rail size started to increase, and a need for better holding ballast became evident as track structure started to deteriorate, which caused more maintenance. So the railroads experimented with river stone. It worked but was discovered not very well as the track seemed to float on marbles. Then they tried crushed stone, and found that crushed stone and mechanical tamper machines would make a very strong track structure. A crushed stone ballasts track would now last for an average of 5-10 years with normal maintenance where as a gravel ballasts track would require maintenance every 1-3 years.
Subject Author Posted

Ballast question

kcsivils May 11, 2017 05:30PM

Re: Ballast question

Chris Walker May 11, 2017 05:32PM

Re: Ballast question

Brian Norden May 11, 2017 07:53PM

Re: Ballast question

narrowgaugejoe10 May 12, 2017 04:41AM

Re: Ballast question

Colorado76 May 11, 2017 06:09PM

Re: Ballast question

narrowgaugejoe10 May 11, 2017 06:50PM

Re: Ballast question

nedsn3 May 12, 2017 08:49AM

Re: Ballast question

Tomstp May 12, 2017 03:04PM

Re: Ballast question

jim pallow May 12, 2017 06:16PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login