Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

The "new" CRRM

May 03, 2016 01:18PM avatar
The fact that the CRRM is so financial healthy may be evidence of how much the museum has changed since the good (bad?) old days when it was a seat of the pants operation run by Bob and Cornelius. Perhaps one of the reasons the 493 deal caught so many of us by surprise is we still tend to think of the CRRM in terms of a couple little teakettles puffing around a tight loop of bad track, and it is hard to imagine the 491 or the 493 hauling a relatively long train. I personally have a lot of nostalgia for the old days, but realistically the museum's leaders probably deserve a round of applause for a job well done. But at the same time I think Jason raises legit issues in terms of managing the "tension" between need for fund raising and the goal of historic preservation and interpretation.

JBWX



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/03/2016 01:18PM by John West.
Subject Author Posted

A new CRRM / 493 thread

Jason Midyette May 02, 2016 01:33PM

Re: A new CRRM / 493 thread

Don Richter May 02, 2016 04:58PM

Re: A new CRRM / 493 thread

Samart May 02, 2016 06:01PM

CRRM's 2014 Annual Report (AKA 990)

Brian Shoup May 03, 2016 10:55AM

The "new" CRRM

John West May 03, 2016 01:18PM

"tension"

Brian Shoup May 03, 2016 03:26PM

Nothing new....

RDannemann May 03, 2016 10:01AM

360 or 361 CRRM

Stephen Peck May 03, 2016 10:27AM

Re: 360 or 361 CRRM

rehunn May 03, 2016 12:05PM

Re: A new CRRM / 493 thread

SMITTY May 03, 2016 02:24PM

Re: A new CRRM / 493 thread

hsuthe May 04, 2016 12:23PM

Re: A new CRRM / 493 thread

Wayne Hoskin May 04, 2016 07:32PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login