Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Tripartite Agreement

January 23, 2015 09:00PM
Hi,
The agreement was due to BOTH the AT&SF taking Raton and the D&RGW being leased to the AT&SF (hanging bridge is an AT&SF construction). I think the third party was the CB&Q.
AT&SF was not allowed to build west of the front range and the D&RG was not allowed to build south for 10 years. I think the CB&Q was also not allowed to build into the mountains for 10 years.
When Palmer lost the D&RG, he retained control of the RGW/D&RGW in Utah. The branch south into south central Utah was to be a sothern extension. Plans to build west from Green River to the Salinas(?) branch for the southern mainline to Mexico City had been located.
Would have been interesting trying to cross the canyons along the Colorado River.
Doug vV
Subject Author Posted

what if - Rio Chama

CraigjP January 21, 2015 03:14PM

Re: What if - Rio Chama

Johnson Barr January 21, 2015 05:49PM

Re: What if - Rio Chama

christopher king January 21, 2015 09:10PM

Re: What if - Rio Chama

WilliamDiehl January 24, 2015 01:00AM

Re: What if - Rio Chama "Flowers" ... eye rolling smiley Attachments

Johnson Barr January 24, 2015 11:49AM

Re: What if - Rio Chama "Flowers" ... eye rolling smiley

weston1879 January 24, 2015 08:37PM

Re: what if - Rio Chama

nickgully January 21, 2015 09:49PM

Re: what if - Rio Chama

Russo Loco January 22, 2015 05:05PM

Re: what if - Rio Chama

Dave Peterson January 22, 2015 05:22PM

Re: what if - Rio Chama

dougvv January 22, 2015 05:50PM

Re: what if - Rio Chama

Earl January 22, 2015 07:30PM

Barranca Hill

hank January 23, 2015 02:30PM

Re: what if - Rio Chama

weston1879 January 22, 2015 11:56PM

Tripartite Agreement

hank January 23, 2015 02:11PM

Re: Tripartite Agreement

guymonmd January 23, 2015 02:52PM

Re: Tripartite Agreement

weston1879 January 23, 2015 06:59PM

Re: Tripartite Agreement

dougvv January 23, 2015 09:00PM

Re: Tripartite Agreement

Chris Walker January 23, 2015 09:22PM

Re: Tripartite Agreement - UP not CB&Q - Raton

hank January 24, 2015 09:43AM

Re: Tripartite Agreement - UP not CB&Q - Raton

dougvv January 24, 2015 07:01PM

Re: Tripartite Agreement - UP not CB&Q - Raton

pd3463 January 24, 2015 07:34PM

Re: The Treaty of Boston - not the Tripartite Agreement

Brian Norden January 24, 2015 09:57PM

Re: The Treaty of Boston - not the Tripartite Agreement

dougvv January 24, 2015 11:21PM

Re: what if - Rio Chama

weston1879 January 22, 2015 11:59PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login