Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

November 03, 2014 07:35AM avatar
The difference with 493 and 498 is they ran much later towards the end of the D&RGW. 498 of course being on the last train. 491 by contrast was overhauled and ended up sitting around from the time of its overhaul until it was restored by the museum. It was very low mileage out of its overhaul.
Subject Author Posted

Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

Jack Campbell November 01, 2014 09:10AM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

Samart November 01, 2014 09:20AM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

rehunn November 01, 2014 09:34AM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

Rich Murray November 01, 2014 09:38AM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

dougvv November 01, 2014 09:45AM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

Les Jarrett November 02, 2014 12:47PM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

Mark Huber November 02, 2014 08:48PM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

rehunn November 02, 2014 08:58PM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

Will Gant November 03, 2014 07:35AM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

Tomstp November 03, 2014 08:49AM

Re: Cosmetic Restoration VS. Operational Restoration

tomc November 03, 2014 08:52AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login