Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Thomas

September 18, 2014 02:57PM
Hadder Wrote:
=======================================================
> Interesting they have Thomas on front of the 491.
> Most Railroads operate Day out with Thomas with
> the 'Powered Locomotive' on the opposite end from
> Thomas. I thought that was part of the contract,
> so that attention is not taken away from the
> 'Really Useful Engine'.

Hadder,
Checking today, there is not and never was a clause in the Thomas contract that the locomotive has to push on the rear of the Thomas train. I think that depends on what the individual railroad want's to do. If the railroad is on the flat with point to point operation, that would make sense. The CRRM runs forward around the loop and never backs up with the train. With our curves and 4% grades running with the engine pushing would be pure stupidity. I've been deeply involved with the first 5 Thomas's at the CRRM and the Hit people never had the contract say we need to run one way or another. They let us do what we feel safe doing. Only important order from Hit was "don't cross Thomas's eyes."



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2014 11:43AM by HighCommander.
Subject Author Posted

#491 Attachments

gothpapa September 13, 2014 11:01PM

Re: #491

Stewart Rhine September 14, 2014 06:15AM

Re: #491

gothpapa September 14, 2014 07:01AM

Re: #491

Samart September 14, 2014 07:45AM

Re: #491

Beau Brandstetter September 14, 2014 03:43PM

Thomas

Hadder September 16, 2014 09:34AM

Re: Thomas

HighCommander September 16, 2014 10:10AM

Re: Thomas

guymonmd September 16, 2014 12:21PM

Re: Thomas

HighCommander September 16, 2014 05:43PM

Re: Thomas

Mark Huber September 16, 2014 10:08PM

Re: Thomas

Beau Brandstetter September 16, 2014 02:15PM

Re: Thomas

Bernie Perch September 16, 2014 02:26PM

Re: Thomas

philip.marshall September 16, 2014 04:50PM

Re: Thomas Attachments

Mike Stillwell September 19, 2014 09:06AM

Re: Thomas

HogandTow September 16, 2014 03:17PM

Re: Thomas

Chris Walker September 16, 2014 04:05PM

Re: Thomas

rehunn September 16, 2014 04:10PM

Re: Thomas

crackerjackhoghead September 16, 2014 04:19PM

Re: Thomas

rehunn September 16, 2014 04:38PM

Re: Pushing Thomas

Chris Walker September 16, 2014 04:39PM

Re: Thomas

Randall Hess September 16, 2014 04:44PM

Re: Thomas

crackerjackhoghead September 16, 2014 05:07PM

Re: Thomas

Jack Campbell September 16, 2014 05:08PM

Re: Thomas

Will Gant September 16, 2014 07:56PM

Re: Thomas

jim pallow September 17, 2014 10:26AM

Re: Thomas ... confused smiley

Russo Loco September 17, 2014 09:00PM

Re: Thomas

HighCommander September 18, 2014 02:57PM

Re: Thomas

John Cole September 18, 2014 04:00PM

Re: Thomas

HighCommander September 18, 2014 05:34PM

Re: #491

jim pallow September 16, 2014 11:51AM

Re: #491

Tom Platten September 16, 2014 04:25PM

Re: #491

John Cole September 16, 2014 04:30PM

Re: #491

Tom Platten September 16, 2014 08:36PM

Re: #491

John Cole September 16, 2014 09:23PM

Re: #491

HighCommander September 16, 2014 10:16PM

Re: #491

HighCommander September 16, 2014 10:26PM

Re: #491

jwebb September 17, 2014 12:38PM

Re: #491

John Cole September 17, 2014 02:15PM

Re: #491

Chris Walker September 17, 2014 02:20PM

Re: #491

crackerjackhoghead September 17, 2014 02:29PM

Re: #491

jalbers September 17, 2014 02:38PM

Looping two-footers

philip.marshall September 17, 2014 03:03PM

Re: Looping two-footers

rehunn September 17, 2014 03:04PM

Re: Looping two-footers

crackerjackhoghead September 17, 2014 03:07PM

Re: #491

HighCommander September 17, 2014 03:05PM

Re: #491 Attachments

Chris Walker September 17, 2014 04:09PM

Re: #491

HighCommander September 17, 2014 10:52PM

Re: #491

Hank Porter September 18, 2014 12:19PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login