Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

July 22, 2014 09:05AM avatar
The counterweights are different from the NG ones. There is no way to install a counterweight on a driver. It is one big casting.

About the only thing saved in the conversion to SG might have been the side frames themselves. New frame crossties would have been made as the original frames were too far apart to be used in Standard gauge. New cylinders were installed, the valve gear hangers were changed. New axles made and new driver centers created. The Rushton trailing truck may have been saved, but the truck frame would have been narrowed to convert to SG.

It was a huge job to do this, especially in the 1950's. Obviously NdeM had the foundry and shop facilities to essentially create a new locomotive utilizing a 50 year old boiler.

They spent a lot of pesos to create a 55-ton standard gauge 2-8-2.
Subject Author Posted

Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

davidtltc July 21, 2014 07:26AM

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

nedsn3 July 21, 2014 08:46AM

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

DKRickman July 21, 2014 09:45PM

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

Earl July 22, 2014 09:05AM

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

davidtltc July 22, 2014 05:37PM

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

Donald Foster July 22, 2014 06:10PM

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

rehunn July 22, 2014 06:13PM

Re: Rio Grande NG, N de M Standard Gauge

Earl July 22, 2014 06:39PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login