Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: WW&F RR #9

December 18, 2012 07:31PM
My understanding is that a benefit of the Forney patent was that the truck under the tender end did double duty when running tender-first ... it supported the tender and it piloted the locomotive around curves. A couple of years ago, when I took my wife & younger daughter for a ride on the WW&F, a very gracious engineer offered me a ride in the cab, and from that experience I am fairly certain that the locomotive provides better visibility over the tender than around the boiler. And, of course, running tender-first doesn't transmit as much stress through the boiler, since the main load is attached directly to the driving chassis.

So, why did Maine railroads end up running those locomotives boiler-first?
Subject Author Posted

WW&F RR #9

Adam Wright December 12, 2012 11:05AM

Re: WW&F RR #9

elecuyer December 12, 2012 11:29AM

Re: WW&F RR #9

Stewart Rhine December 12, 2012 02:41PM

Re: WW&F RR #9

KevinM December 12, 2012 03:16PM

Re: WW&F RR #9

mikerowe December 12, 2012 04:27PM

Re: WW&F RR #9 (pic) Attachments

B. Barry December 13, 2012 08:00AM

Re: WW&F RR #9

Stewart Rhine December 13, 2012 04:13PM

Re: WW&F RR #9

jcpatten December 18, 2012 05:19AM

Re: WW&F RR #9

Stewart Rhine December 18, 2012 06:16AM

Re: WW&F RR #9

KevinM December 18, 2012 12:44PM

Re: WW&F RR #9

Stewart Rhine December 18, 2012 02:28PM

Re: WW&F RR #9

Randall Hess December 18, 2012 07:31PM

Re: WW&F RR #9

jcpatten December 19, 2012 05:06AM

Re: WW&F RR #9

Keith Taylor December 19, 2012 03:59PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login