Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: No need for a third rail - or third opinion ... eye rolling smiley

December 05, 2012 05:56AM
Russo Loco Wrote:
=======================================================
> I agree -
>
> ... But it's really clear from analysis of the
> shades of grey on the boiler jacket in
> both B&W photos that the locomotive came out of
> the factory with a BEAUTIFUL
> Dark Olive Green boiler jacket!!    
> smileys with beer



I know you really like green and all, and I'm not sure how serious you are, but the above statement is not correct. The Holman locomotive pictured was built with a planished iron boiler jacket that would have been medium-dark grey. That was the norm for its era. Green-painted boilers didn't appear until the 20th century, and were never very common besides.

The rest of the Holman locomotive was painted in a custom royal blue paintjob with extensive striping. It was the 1890's equivalent of circus colors since its job was to attract attention. I don't think this locomotive had any purpose to its existence beyond scamming unwary investors out of their money.
Subject Author Posted

No need for a third rail Attachments

Bill Pratt December 04, 2012 08:33PM

Re: No need for a third rail

NGJunkie December 04, 2012 11:03PM

Re: No need for a third rail Attachments

mikerowe December 04, 2012 11:13PM

Re: No need for a third rail

South Park December 05, 2012 12:39AM

Re: No need for a third rail - or third opinion ... eye rolling smiley

Russo Loco December 05, 2012 12:56AM

Re: No need for a third rail - or third opinion ... eye rolling smiley

James December 05, 2012 05:56AM

Re: No need for a third rail - or third opinion ... eye rolling smiley

Dirk Ramsey December 05, 2012 06:18AM

Re: No need for a third rail - or third opinion ... eye rolling smiley

South Park December 05, 2012 09:48AM

Re: No need to rail against third opinions ... eye popping smiley

Russo Loco December 05, 2012 07:33PM

Re: No need to rail against third opinions ... eye popping smiley

James December 06, 2012 07:34AM

Re: No need to rail against third opinions ... eye popping smiley

Russo Loco December 06, 2012 01:17PM

Re: No need to rail against third opinions ... eye popping smiley

South Park December 07, 2012 08:16AM

Re: No need for a third rail

Rich Murray December 05, 2012 06:46AM

Re: No need for this contraption

Jim Grigsby December 05, 2012 11:01AM

Re: No need for this contraption

AZfarmer December 05, 2012 01:09PM

Re: No need for this contraption

Russo Loco December 05, 2012 08:04PM

Re: No need for this contraption

Jim Grigsby December 06, 2012 10:59AM

Re: No need for this contraption ... confused smiley

Russo Loco December 06, 2012 01:54PM

Re: No need for a third rail

RDannemann December 05, 2012 03:38PM

Re: No need for a third rail

Dirk Ramsey December 06, 2012 01:32AM

Re: No need for a third rail Attachments

Jon Bentz December 06, 2012 09:57AM

Re: No need for a green jacket

Russo Loco December 06, 2012 02:22PM

Patent Attachments

bcp December 06, 2012 02:42PM

Re: Patent

GeorgeGaskill December 07, 2012 03:08PM

Re: Patent

C. Llamas December 13, 2012 02:18PM

That photo is the second one built

bcp December 06, 2012 11:10AM

Re: Photo of n.g. to s.g. conversion ... confused smiley

Russo Loco December 06, 2012 02:29PM

Re: That photo is the second one built

RDannemann December 06, 2012 04:36PM

Re: That photo is the second one built

Dirk Ramsey December 07, 2012 04:41AM

Re: That photo is the second one built

South Park December 07, 2012 08:26AM

Re: That photo is the second one built

Jim Grigsby December 09, 2012 12:41PM

Re: That photo is the second one built

Bruce R. Pier December 09, 2012 02:10PM

Re: Patents? Ve don't care about no schtinkin' Patents!

Russo Loco December 07, 2012 11:58AM

Re: Patents? Ve don't care about no schtinkin' Patents!

bcp December 09, 2012 06:27PM

Re: Patents? Ve don't need no geschtinkinde Patents!

Russo Loco December 09, 2012 07:40PM

Re: Patents? Ve don't need no geschtinkinde Patents!

South Park December 09, 2012 08:45PM

Re: Patents? Ve don't need no geschtinkinde Patents!

Russo Loco December 10, 2012 08:52PM

Re: Patents? Ve don't need no geschtinkinde Patents!

South Park December 10, 2012 08:54PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login