Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

CharlieMcCandless

February 12, 2012 08:12PM

Registered: 16 years ago
Posts: 4,637

It seems to me that train control would be better with engines on either end of the train. Then you would have two force vectors rather than three. Then again I may be all wet with this. Experts?

Reply Quote

Message List Previous Message Next Message

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
Interesting Train at Windy Point	Rich Muth	February 12, 2012 10:35AM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	Greg Scholl	February 12, 2012 12:37PM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	BrianJ	February 12, 2012 12:52PM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	Greg Scholl	February 12, 2012 05:23PM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	Earl	February 13, 2012 09:36AM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	Greg Scholl	February 13, 2012 02:21PM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	pd3463	February 12, 2012 06:48PM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	CharlieMcCandless	February 12, 2012 08:12PM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	drgwk37	February 13, 2012 08:32AM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	guymonmd	February 13, 2012 10:15AM
Re: Interesting Train at Windy Point	John C	February 13, 2012 07:08PM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

488 stops for water at Los Pinos tank on closing day Oct. 1979. Photo courtesy Don Richter

The NGDF was started by Don Richter and is currently operated in his memory by Nathan Holmes and others. Others who have contributed to the upkeep of this board are (in no particular order): Charles McCandless, Everett Lueck, Ted Wilton, Cole Adams, James Bane, John Moellmer, Jon Bentz, Linn Moedinger, lloyd lehrer, Rod Jensen, John Craft, Steven Forney, Herb Kelsey, Bill Ramaley, Russ Sperry (El Russo Loco), Josh McNeal, John West, Jim Armstrong, Bob Bergstrom, Greg Scholl, Blake Forbes Doug van Veelen and Mark Fuller.