Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: K-36 486

September 24, 2010 08:57PM
The 486 has had significant run time this summer. I personally wouldn't qualify it as a back up to the others. It received as many, if not more days of service than the several of the other locomotives.

PS: If one wants to go into semantics:

Service [sur-vis]
Noun, Adjective, Verb, -iced, ic.ing.

-Verb (used with object)
1. To make fit for use; repair; restore to condition for service: Ex. to service an automobile.

2. To supply with...

I believe that should suffice.

In any case, I just felt that I wanted to state my case. It bothers me that instead of being intrigued or interested with the information posted, the first response is to point out what some believe to be flaws in semantics. It becomes frustrating to those who post, want to post, or simply read this forum. I understand others and their expressed dissatisfaction in the previously stated posts. In any case, my sincere apologies if "required servicing and testing" fell short to some. Perhaps a synonym for servicing, such as 'maintenance,' would have been a better fit for the subject in hand. In any case, I digress. One does well to embrace his/her hobbies and passions. Insignificant squabbling does nothing to forward these interests.
Subject Author Posted

K-36 486

VaughnNG September 23, 2010 10:45PM

Re: K-36 486

tpeterman September 24, 2010 05:39AM

Re: K-36 486

hank September 24, 2010 11:44AM

Re: K-36 486

tpeterman September 24, 2010 08:08PM

Re: K-36 486

K-27 Afficianado September 24, 2010 07:17AM

Re: K-36 486

SG&N 44 September 24, 2010 07:37AM

Re: K-36 486

MD Ramsey September 24, 2010 07:47AM

Re: K-36 486

BrianJ September 24, 2010 02:40PM

Re: K-36 486

VaughnNG September 24, 2010 08:57PM

Re: K-36 486

John Cole September 24, 2010 10:00PM

Re: K-36 486

Festus September 27, 2010 09:40AM

Re: K-36 486

John C September 24, 2010 05:59PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login