Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

K-36 486

September 23, 2010 10:45PM
An interesting thought:

As of today, K-36 486 has seven (7) days of service remaining on it's One thousand four hundred seventy-two (1472) service day inspection as required by the FRA under section 230.17. This section reads:

(a) General. Before any steam locomotive is initially put in service or brought out of retirement, and after every 1472 service days or 15 years, whichever is earlier, an individual competent to conduct the inspection shall inspect the entire boiler. In the case of a new locomotive or a locomotive being brought out of retirement, the initial 15 year period shall begin on the day that the locomotive is placed in service or 365 calendar days after the first flue tube is installed in the locomotive, whichever comes first. This 1472 service day inspection shall include all annual, and 5th annual, inspection requirements, as well as any items required by the steam locomotive owner and/or operator or the FRA inspector. At this time, the locomotive owner and/or operator shall complete, update and verify the locomotive specification card (FRA Form No. 4), to reflect the condition of the boiler at the time of this inspection. See appendices A and B of this part.

(b) Filing inspection reports. Within 30 days of completing the 1472 service day inspection, the steam locomotive owner and/or operator shall, for each steam locomotive inspected, file in the place where the steam locomotive is maintained and with the FRA Regional Administrator for that region a report of inspection (FRA Form No. 3), and a completed FRA Form No.4. See appendix C of this part.
---
In any case, It is my understanding that K-36 486 is the first locomotive to undergo this requirement because of fulfillment of the complete 1,472 days of service. Quite the accomplishment! It will undergo the required servicing and testing in the following months.
Subject Author Posted

K-36 486

VaughnNG September 23, 2010 10:45PM

Re: K-36 486

tpeterman September 24, 2010 05:39AM

Re: K-36 486

hank September 24, 2010 11:44AM

Re: K-36 486

tpeterman September 24, 2010 08:08PM

Re: K-36 486

K-27 Afficianado September 24, 2010 07:17AM

Re: K-36 486

SG&N 44 September 24, 2010 07:37AM

Re: K-36 486

MD Ramsey September 24, 2010 07:47AM

Re: K-36 486

BrianJ September 24, 2010 02:40PM

Re: K-36 486

VaughnNG September 24, 2010 08:57PM

Re: K-36 486

John Cole September 24, 2010 10:00PM

Re: K-36 486

Festus September 27, 2010 09:40AM

Re: K-36 486

John C September 24, 2010 05:59PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login