Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Putting it in perspective..

Chama Crew Caller
December 31, 2001 07:39AM
Prehaps so.... With nothing by small C class power, every train would have been around 10-20 cars - on flat ground, with a couple more helpers on Cumbres. In terms of carloadings, the 50-56 period was the busiest. It would be facinating to find a train register or dispatcher's sheet for the WWI era.
Somewhere I read the busiest time ever in Chama in terms of number of locomotives dispatched/serviced was April, 1952. Somewhere I have some records of all that. but can't find them. The railroad literally ran as many trains as it humanly and mechanically could. I heard they serviced 400 locomotives that month.
Another thing, in late 1950, there were 17 "big" engines out of Alamosa: the 3 K-28's, 482, 484, 485, 488 and the 10 490's. On 10/28/50, 10 of them were in Chama at one point. Figuring boiler washes, engines in shop, etc. I would guess nearly every big narrow gauge engine te DRGW could field out of Alamosa went through Chama that day.
The situation in April, 52 was worse as 482 and 485 had been sent to Salida. 473 was in the Alamosa shop after derailing on the Silverton Br. 476 and 484 were also in for overhaul, leaving only 13 engines. At least they didn't have to run 215-16 then.
Subject Author Posted

Chama Train Register Notes - 10/28/50

Chama Crew Caller December 29, 2001 08:22AM

Too early!

Greg Scholl December 29, 2001 11:28AM

Re: Chama Train Register Notes - 10/28/50

Gregory Raven December 29, 2001 12:52PM

Putting it in perspective..

Chama Crew Caller December 31, 2001 07:39AM

Check this link out

william December 29, 2001 09:31PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.