Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Grant Money

December 17, 2009 11:22AM
I agree, I doubt it would be economically justifiable.

However, I think of this as similar to Kyle's operation of the C&TS. He subsidized the operation from his pocket with profits from his freight operations.

If the SV&RG can get a grant to dual gauge Alamosa to Antonito, all I can say is go for it and support it 100%. If that is how we get our tax money into something we can support, great. Sure it can be better spent elsewhere but when the Feds spend stimulus money for insurance programs on honey bees and other like items, what is the harm in trying to get it for something we enjoy even if it is not economically justified in the private sector.

The whole C&TS is marginally justifiably by itself. If CO & NM had not stepped up to the plate in 1970, we'd have nothing to discuss here, the entire operation would be gone and Dave would be trying overlays of aerial photos to find where the Cumbres line went.

The entire dual gauge might be the sacrificial lamb on the grant. This allows the Feds to say they "saved" money and the applicant to get what they wanted. And what if the Feds OK the grant including the 3rd rail? A grant does not need to be paid back and so (although I'd like a reduction in taxes myself), we get something of value that makes us feel that our tax money is not being spent and we get no value for it.

Personally, I would like the money spent to run track west from Chama to Monero Canyon. I think it would be a more enjoyable ride than Alamosa to Antonito. It would allow narrow gauge to span the continental divide also.

I think economic justification can not be ignored but to focus on it to the exclusion of all else is also not quite correct.

I think we can all agree that economically, both the 3rd rail from Alamosa to Antonito and the C&TS are not justified. It is the historical significance that tilts the scales. to supporting a marginal operation.

Can we get out of the economic justified rut and see what else can be gleened from the interesting possibility?

The lack of turnout part availability is a non-issue. ALTHOUGH possibly expensive, there is a company in Alabama that is willing to make dual gauge turnouts in its shop. It also will manufacture turnouts/switches in 85# rail.

My opinion.

Doug vV
Subject Author Posted

What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Ken in Buena Vista December 13, 2009 10:38AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

SebJ December 14, 2009 08:32AM

Valley Line Possibilities

Kevin Cook December 16, 2009 03:43PM

Re: Valley Line Possibilities

hank December 16, 2009 07:50PM

Valley Line Possibilities

Kevin Cook December 17, 2009 04:24PM

Re: Valley Line Possibilities

hank December 17, 2009 05:14PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Eric Bolton December 14, 2009 09:12AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

jim pallow December 14, 2009 12:01PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

southparkline1 December 14, 2009 05:31PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

dougvv December 16, 2009 02:27PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

dougvv December 16, 2009 02:29PM

Re: NG/SG 'Photo Op' - Big $$$$ (pic) Attachments

Russo Loco December 17, 2009 10:40AM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

Russo Loco December 16, 2009 10:49AM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

Steve Forney December 16, 2009 11:12AM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

Russo Loco December 16, 2009 11:28AM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

Steve Forney December 16, 2009 01:43PM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

Russo Loco December 16, 2009 01:52PM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

dougvv December 16, 2009 02:39PM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

Will Gant December 16, 2009 07:22PM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

Russo Loco December 17, 2009 10:44AM

Re: Why Third Rail? Big $$$, Little Gain

Ken in Buena Vista December 25, 2009 01:50PM

conversions

hank December 25, 2009 07:28PM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

Greg Scholl December 16, 2009 11:22AM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

Russo Loco December 16, 2009 11:31AM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

southparkline1 December 16, 2009 02:20PM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

george pearce December 16, 2009 04:12PM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

Ken in Buena Vista December 17, 2009 06:22AM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

Earl December 18, 2009 09:08AM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

guymonmd December 17, 2009 10:20AM

Re: Why Third Rail? BIG CO$T, Little Gain

Russo Loco December 17, 2009 10:51AM

Grant Money

dougvv December 17, 2009 11:22AM

Re: Grant Money

BrianJ December 17, 2009 11:47AM

Re: Grant Money

Russo Loco December 17, 2009 03:12PM

Re: Grant Money

dougvv December 17, 2009 06:57PM

the great speed debate

hank December 18, 2009 02:24PM

Re: Grant Money

Steve Forney December 17, 2009 10:44PM

Re: Grant Money

guymonmd December 18, 2009 08:48AM

Re: Grant Money

Russo Loco December 18, 2009 09:29AM

Re: Grant Money

Earl December 18, 2009 10:22PM

Re: Grant Money

Russo Loco December 19, 2009 06:54PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Ed Ellis December 19, 2009 08:53PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

dougvv December 20, 2009 05:53AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG) Ed Ellis

Ken in Buena Vista December 20, 2009 08:25AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG) Ed Ellis

Ed Ellis December 20, 2009 09:00AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG) Ed Ellis

Russo Loco December 20, 2009 12:51PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG) Ed Ellis

dougvv December 20, 2009 02:37PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG) Ed Ellis

george pearce December 20, 2009 02:47PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG) Ed Ellis

Ed Ellis December 20, 2009 05:01PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Steve Forney December 21, 2009 11:36AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Will Gant December 23, 2009 08:39PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Twinkyllamas December 21, 2009 04:11PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Russo Loco December 22, 2009 10:05AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Twinkyllamas December 22, 2009 10:13AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

southparkline1 December 22, 2009 02:32PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

CharlieMcCandless December 22, 2009 02:44PM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

hank December 22, 2009 07:50PM

Re: Line from South Fork to Creede, etc ...

Russo Loco December 23, 2009 12:46PM

Re: Line from South Fork to Creede, etc ... Attachments

mikerowe December 23, 2009 01:19PM

Re: Line from South Fork to Creede, etc ...

gbrewer December 23, 2009 01:24PM

Re: Line from South Fork to Creede, etc ...

GeorgeGaskill December 24, 2009 11:53AM

Re: Line from South Fork to Creede, etc ...

CharlieMcCandless December 23, 2009 07:48PM

494 and 495

Kevin Cook December 23, 2009 08:53AM

I am still not sold on third rail

CharlieMcCandless December 22, 2009 02:53PM

Re: I am still not sold on third rail

Hauspiper January 27, 2010 09:26PM

Re: . . status of SLVRMI (NNG), dirt train & what's that

Ken in Buena Vista January 27, 2010 07:51PM

Re: . . status of SLVRMI (NNG), dirt train & what's that

Ken in Buena Vista January 28, 2010 06:38AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Ken in Buena Vista January 28, 2010 06:42AM

Re: What is the status of SLVRMI (NNG)

Twinkyllamas January 28, 2010 03:21PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login