Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

November 22, 2009 08:58AM
Dan Robirds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your best bet for a "modern" 36" gauge articulated
> of North American design is to look at the NdeM
> 2-6-6-2's. Roughly the same as the Uintah/SVRY
> locos, but obviously a bigger boiler.

I believe this is correct...the NdeM locomotives had the same
cylinder dimensions, but drivers were 1" bigger at 43" giving
them a t.e. that was just a scoce less.

As to mallets never built, you could certainly add the proposed
75 cm. 2-10-10-2's of the RFIRT in Argentina. I was allowed to
photograph the plans & these were published in Pacific News in
1977 IIRC.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/22/2009 09:01AM by Tom Moungovan.
Subject Author Posted

proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

dougvv November 21, 2009 07:31PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Dan Robirds November 21, 2009 07:52PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Tom Moungovan November 22, 2009 08:58AM

Uintah 2-6-6-2 drawing & K36-37 live steam drawings

dougvv November 22, 2009 12:42PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

J.B.Bane November 21, 2009 08:07PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

bcp November 21, 2009 09:11PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

dougvv November 22, 2009 09:58AM

C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

dougvv November 22, 2009 02:01AM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

Thor Windbergs November 22, 2009 03:26AM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

dougvv November 22, 2009 10:08AM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

Hauspiper November 24, 2009 11:55AM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2? Attachments

Thor Windbergs November 25, 2009 05:41PM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

Phil Raynes November 28, 2009 04:12PM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

Hauspiper November 29, 2009 08:32PM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

Russo Loco November 23, 2009 11:54PM

Re: C-16 Garratt 2-8-0+0-8-2?

Gavin Hamilton November 24, 2009 07:35AM

Re: C-21+M12 Meyer-Garratt 2-8-0+2-6-0?

Russo Loco November 24, 2009 11:13AM

Re: C-21+M12 Meyer-Garratt 2-8-0+2-6-0? Attachments

Gavin Hamilton November 25, 2009 09:09AM

Re: C-21+M12 Meyer-Garratt 2-8-0+2-6-0?

CraigjP December 03, 2009 08:12PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Jerry Day November 22, 2009 11:35AM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

dougvv November 22, 2009 12:37PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Bill Dennehy November 24, 2009 09:33AM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Jerry Day November 24, 2009 03:24PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

jim pallow November 22, 2009 06:13PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

CraigjP November 22, 2009 06:55PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

ebtrr November 24, 2009 02:55PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Bruce R. Pier November 24, 2009 05:28PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Gavin Hamilton December 01, 2009 10:25AM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

dougvv December 01, 2009 10:58AM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Gavin Hamilton December 01, 2009 12:44PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

christensenge December 01, 2009 03:25PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Gavin Hamilton December 03, 2009 01:34AM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

christensenge December 03, 2009 01:25PM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

Gavin Hamilton December 04, 2009 03:43AM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

christensenge December 04, 2009 10:10AM

Re: proposed mallets never built and SV/Uintah

ChasM December 01, 2009 02:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login